Back

DNA adduct and mutational profiles reveal a threshold of cellular defenses against N-nitrosodimethylamine administered to mice in drinking water

Gubina, N. E.; Volk, L. B.; Dormitzer, A. F.; Michelsen, E. M.; Pribyl, L. J.; Corrigan, J. J.; Dalvie, E. D.; Armijo, A. L.; Norales, M. M.; Bugher, N. A.; Schonvisky, K. M.; Plata, D. L.; Engelward, B. P.; Croy, R. G.; Essigmann, J. M.; Fedeles, B. I.

2025-11-14 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.11.13.687536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is classified as an animal and probable human carcinogen. Murine liver DNA adducts, mutations, MGMT and CYP2E1 were evaluated following chronic administration of NDMA in drinking water. In a dose-escalation study, 7-methylguanine (m7G) increased linearly with NDMA dose. O6-Methylguanine (m6G) remained near background for NDMA doses up to [~]1 ppm, beyond which its level, and corresponding mutations, rose steeply. An extended study was done with 5 ppm NDMA, in which adducts were measured at 3 weeks and mutations at 10 weeks. While the level of CYP2E1 was unchanged, MGMT gene transcription was induced in females at 10 weeks. Homologous recombination-mediated chromosomal rearrangements did not increase over background. Point mutations, however, were elevated substantially in both sexes. Mutational analysis over 96 trinucleotide contexts revealed predominantly GC[->]AT mutations in 5-purine-G-3 contexts in a pattern matching human COSMIC cancer mutational signature SBS11, with secondary features resembling SBS119 (AT[->]GC). Taken together, the data implicate m6G as the dominant mutagenic adduct under chronic dosing with NDMA. Furthermore, the genomic m6G level was identified at which its dedicated repair protein, MGMT, became saturated. The coordinated application of DNA adduct, mutational and biochemical analyses provides a new approach for early detection and cancer management. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=103 SRC="FIGDIR/small/687536v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e6ae72org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c6fad6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7e3716org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@52a87b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
3
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
7
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
10
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
14
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
21
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%