Health Risk Assessment for an Unregulated Neurotoxic Nicotine Analogue in Oral Pouch Products
Jabba, S. V.; Erythropel, H. C.; Silinski, P.; Mellinghoff, R. A.; Anastas, P. T.; Zimmerman, J. B.; Jordt, S. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundOral pouch products containing nicotine analogues such as 6-methyl nicotine (6MN) were recently introduced to evade federal and state regulations. Preclinical studies demonstrated that 6MN is more toxic than nicotine and binds to nicotinic receptors with higher potency. However, the nicotine analogue contents of oral pouch products and the associated health risks remain unknown. MethodsTwenty-five flavor varieties from three oral pouch product (OPP) brands (Aroma-King, Hippotine-Happy Hippo, MG-Upperdeckys) marketed to contain 6MN were purchased in 2024-25. 6MN was quantified by either GC-FID (Yale) or GC-MS (Duke) to assess the estimated exposure dose (EED) from OPP use. Health risks associated with acute 6MN exposure from a single pouch use were assessed by calculating (i) hazard quotient (HQ) for heart-rate increase, and (ii) margin of exposure (MOE) for convulsions, with HQ more than 1 considered a potential health risk and the acceptable safety threshold value of MOE for proconvulsive effects considered 10. For comparison, both risk measures were determined for Zyn nicotine pouch products. Results6MN contents in analyzed OPPs ranged from 2.96-14.5 mg and diverged significantly from labelled contents for some products. HQs for 6MN OPPs for heart-rate increase ranged from 74-381, compared to 95-162 for nicotine in Zyn. MOEs for convulsion risk ranged from 0.6-2.8, indicating elevated risk. MOEs for nicotine in Zyn products were 3.2-5.4 Conclusions6MN contents in novel pouch products are higher than in popular nicotine pouch products. Consumers using these products are exposed to 6MN levels that may exceed safety thresholds, potentially leading to adverse health effects. Nicotine analogues should be urgently addressed by lawmakers and regulators, and FDA should be authorized to regulate products containing them.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the environmental impact of medicines in Italy using data from the Italian Medicines Agency 90%
- Anti-thyroid drug use during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of birth defects in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies with methodological considerations 88%
- Investigation on the interaction between nifedipine and ritonavir containing antivirus regimens: a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tat_BioV: Tattoo ink exposure and biokinetics of selected tracers in a short-term quasi-experimental clinical study of 24 subjects 95%
- High-throughput PBK modelling for dermal exposure: a pragmatic approach to predict systemic pharmacokinetics 91%
- Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency determinations for NDMA support the cumulative dose assumption underpinning the less-than-lifetime Threshold of Toxicological Concern 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between residential exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and liver injury markers 91%
- Developmental exposure to a PFAS mixture impairs the anamnestic response to influenza A virus infection in mice 90%
- Ten Years of Using Key Characteristics of Human Carcinogens to Organize and Evaluate Mechanistic Evidence in IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans: Patterns and Associations 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stability of extemporaneously compounded amiloride nasal spray 93%
- How important are concurrent vehicle control groups in (sub)chronic non-human primate toxicity studies conducted in pharmaceutical development? An opportunity to reduce animal numbers 93%
- Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking employees in the workplace: A cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.