Normative ranges for auditory brainstem response wave I amplitude: A potential diagnostic indicator of cochlear deafferentation
Kampel, S. D.; McMillan, G. P.; Heassler, A. E.; Whittle, N. K.; Szabo, H. A.; Bramhall, N. F.
Show abstract
PurposeWhile cochlear synaptopathy has limited impact on auditory thresholds, there is increasing evidence that cochlear deafferentation is associated with auditory perceptual deficits. However, there is currently no means for diagnosing synaptopathy or deafferentation in individual patients. The objectives of this study were to establish normative ranges for auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude, a measure sensitive to synaptopathy in animals, in a population at low risk for synaptopathy and then compare a population at high-risk for synaptopathy to the normative ranges. MethodsThe low-risk sample consisted of 169 non-Veteran young adults with normal audiograms, minimal self-reported noise exposure history, and no auditory complaints (tinnitus, decreased sound tolerance, or speech perception in noise difficulty). ABR wave I amplitude normative ranges were generated for 2, 4, and 8 kHz tonebursts and were statistically adjusted for sex and average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels. Ninety-one military Veterans with normal audiograms and at least one auditory complaint were included in the high-risk comparison sample. ResultsWhile the DPOAE-adjusted ABR normative ranges were effective at distinguishing between the low- and high-risk samples, the results also indicated that adjusting the ABR normative ranges for OHC dysfunction may not be necessary and could be problematic. ABR normative ranges that were adjusted only for sex were able to differentiate between the low- and high-risk samples, with 51% of the high-risk sample falling below the normative ranges for a 105 dB peSPL 8 kHz toneburst. ConclusionsIn patients with normal audiograms, sex-specific ABR wave I amplitude normative ranges can be used by clinicians to identify patients with high degrees of cochlear deafferentation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range 98%
- Air-Conduction And Bone-Conduction Reference Threshold Levels – A Multicenter Study 98%
- Intrasubject variability in Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brainstem Auditory Physiology in Children with Listening Difficulties 98%
- The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds 97%
- The role of hidden hearing loss in tinnitus: insights from early markers of peripheral hearing damage 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-in-Noise Test using Antiphasic Stimuli 97%
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 97%
- Minimal and mild hearing loss in children: Association with auditory perception, cognition, and communication problems 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting cochlear synaptopathy in mice with varying degrees of outer hair cell dysfunction using auditory evoked potentials 98%
- Optimizing auditory brainstem response acquisition using interleaved frequencies 96%
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.