Establishing a Process for Community AED Data Transmission
Bednar, S.; Gossip, M.; Ingram, N.; Neiman, G.; Stark, A.; Kreck, M.; Komolafe, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCommunity Automated External Defibrillators (AED) contain valuable clinical data that can impact decision making and care during a patients subsequent hospitalization. However, there are no nationally established standards for obtaining, managing, and transmitting this data. Current practice at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (VCUMC), an urban quaternary academic system, was such that clinicians rarely had this data available for clinical decision making, and for those few patients whose data they did obtain, the process took up to nine days. MethodsThis project aimed to implement a process to deliver community AED data to clinical care teams as quickly as possible. Using Lean Six Sigma methodology, DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Interpret, Control) framework, and PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles, we established an improved process for obtaining and transmitting clinical data following use of community AEDs. We used both real events and simulations to analyze and hone our process. The multidisciplinary project team consisted of clinicians, emergency medical services (EMS), emergency department (ED) leads, information technology, legal/risk, and quality improvement team members. Manufacturers that are known to be in the central Virginia area include: Zoll, Philips, and Stryker. The project we describe targeted Zoll AEDs in VCUMCs outpatient clinics and surrounding Richmond communities. ResultsThe new process was designed and tested with a demonstration of decreased time from cardiac arrest event to data availability in the electronic medical record (EMR). Following each case, we completed additional PDSA cycles to further align EMS and ED workflows. ConclusionsEstablishing a process for obtaining and uploading community AED data to the EMR is feasible and shows faster turnaround than ad hoc efforts. Obtaining the necessary software for AEDs of varying manufacture remains a challenge, but Phase I effectiveness supported advancement to Phase II to include additional AED manufacturers and remaining Central Virginia communities in collaboration with community EMS partners.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 93%
- The High Price of Equity in Pulse Oximetry: A cost evaluation and need for interim solutions 92%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 93%
- Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study 92%
- Improving communications in PPE: A solution for ‘landline’ telephone communication 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing consensus on emergency department interventions that could be conducted in sub-acute care settings for non-emergent paramedic transported visits: A RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study 93%
- Analyzing Supply and Demand on a General Internal Medicine Ward: A Cross-Sectional Study 91%
- Derivation And Validation Of A Clinical Score To Predict Death Among Non-Palliative COVID-19 Patients Presenting To Emergency Departments: The Ccedrrn COVID Mortality Score 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.