Womens perspectives on fetal movement monitoring in high and low stillbirth settings: a qualitative study
Dubuisson, N.; Diez Campa, M.; Ghosh, A. K.; McAuliffe, F.; Nowlan, N.
Show abstract
IntroductionMaternal fetal movement monitoring during pregnancy is commonly advised to assess fetal wellbeing. However, qualitative research exploring how women perceive and implement such advice is lacking, particularly in regions with the highest burden of stillbirth. This study investigates womens experiences and opinions on fetal movement monitoring during pregnancy across high- and low-stillbirth settings. MethodsWomen from three countries with low-stillbirth rates and five with high rates of stillbirth were surveyed and interviewed regarding their experiences with fetal movement monitoring advice. Open-ended answers from the surveys and interview were analysed using inductive thematic methods, while categorical answers were examined using non-parametric statistical analysis. Results234 women were included in the study. The nature and extent of fetal movement monitoring advice varied considerably by country, encompassing active monitoring methods such as kick counting, pattern awareness and movement presence detection, as well as guidance on responding to fetal movements concerns. Notably, 33% (37/112) of women in high-stillbirth countries and 8% (10/122) in low-stillbirth countries reported a lack of any fetal movement monitoring advice. Globally, half of women rated the advice easy to follow, while one-third experienced difficulty understanding their healthcare providers guidance. Key facilitators of following advice included having an active baby and a clear understanding and confidence in the received advice, whereas barriers included a lack of clarity and understanding, difficulty perceiving movements, competing time demands and challenges in identifying patterns of movements. Maternal anxiety was prevalent, with 78% of participants reporting at least occasional anxiety about fetal movements during pregnancy. ConclusionWide variation in the type and consistency of fetal movement monitoring advice across countries indicates the need for further research into the comparative effectiveness of current recommendations, particularly in high-stillbirth settings. High rates of maternal anxiety worldwide highlight the importance of providing support to women navigating fetal movement monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 97%
- Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative interview study 96%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better Survey in the UK and the Netherlands 97%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 96%
- “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 97%
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 96%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 97%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 96%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 95%
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.