Back

Bridging Brain Signals and Self-Reported Symptoms: An AI-Driven, High-Sensitivity Model for Detecting Suicidality in Major Depressive Disorder

Huang, C.-C.; Hsu, C.-L.; Wang, Y.-G.; Chen, T.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Yeh, T.-C.; Huang, T.-H.; Yu, F.-Y.; Liu, Y.-H.; Chu, C.-S.; Chang, H.-A.

2025-11-14 public and global health
10.1101/2025.11.12.25340074 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) with suicidality represents a significant public health concern, as suicide ranks among the leading causes of death worldwide. While electroencephalography (EEG) has shown promise in depression diagnosis, its utility in identifying suicidal risk remains underexplored. This study aims to develop and validate a Suicidal Risk Index (SR Index) using EEG biomarkers and machine learning (ML) algorithms for distinguishing between MDD patients with and without suicidality. MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, resting-state EEG data were collected using Stress EEG Assessment (SEA) system. SR Index was developed by integrating the PHQ-9 scale with EEG-derived features, including band power, coherence, and fractal dimension, optimized using ML algorithms to enhance accuracy. ResultsThe study included 268 participants (159 without suicidality, 109 with suicidality). The SR Index demonstrated robust discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.8117 (p=2.63x10-18). At the optimal cutoff value of 8, the model achieved 88.99% sensitivity, 57.23% specificity, 67.86% positive predictive value, and 78.85% negative predictive value, with a balanced accuracy of 73.11%. ConclusionsThe SR Index shows promise as an objective tool for identifying suicidality in MDD patients, potentially complementing traditional clinical assessments. This approach may enhance early detection and risk stratification in clinical settings, potentially improving suicide prevention strategies. HighlightsO_LINovel EEG- and ML-based Suicidal Risk Index distinguishes MDD patients with and without suicidality. C_LIO_LISR Index achieves 88.99% sensitivity and 73.11% balanced accuracy in identifying suicidal risk. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
2
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
5
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
15
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%