Back

Bridging Brain Signals and Self-Reported Symptoms: An AI-Driven, High-Sensitivity Model for Detecting Suicidality in Major Depressive Disorder

Huang, C.-C.; Hsu, C.-L.; Wang, Y.-G.; Chen, T.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Yeh, T.-C.; Huang, T.-H.; Yu, F.-Y.; Liu, Y.-H.; Chu, C.-S.; Chang, H.-A.

2025-11-14 public and global health
10.1101/2025.11.12.25340074 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) with suicidality represents a significant public health concern, as suicide ranks among the leading causes of death worldwide. While electroencephalography (EEG) has shown promise in depression diagnosis, its utility in identifying suicidal risk remains underexplored. This study aims to develop and validate a Suicidal Risk Index (SR Index) using EEG biomarkers and machine learning (ML) algorithms for distinguishing between MDD patients with and without suicidality. MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, resting-state EEG data were collected using Stress EEG Assessment (SEA) system. SR Index was developed by integrating the PHQ-9 scale with EEG-derived features, including band power, coherence, and fractal dimension, optimized using ML algorithms to enhance accuracy. ResultsThe study included 268 participants (159 without suicidality, 109 with suicidality). The SR Index demonstrated robust discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.8117 (p=2.63x10-18). At the optimal cutoff value of 8, the model achieved 88.99% sensitivity, 57.23% specificity, 67.86% positive predictive value, and 78.85% negative predictive value, with a balanced accuracy of 73.11%. ConclusionsThe SR Index shows promise as an objective tool for identifying suicidality in MDD patients, potentially complementing traditional clinical assessments. This approach may enhance early detection and risk stratification in clinical settings, potentially improving suicide prevention strategies. HighlightsO_LINovel EEG- and ML-based Suicidal Risk Index distinguishes MDD patients with and without suicidality. C_LIO_LISR Index achieves 88.99% sensitivity and 73.11% balanced accuracy in identifying suicidal risk. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%