Uncovering and Understanding Success: A Qualitative Study of High-Performing Hospitals for Small and Sick Newborn Care in Four countries in Africa
Dougherty, K.; Ogueji, I. A.; Mwaniki, H.; Baraka, J.; Ngwala, S.; Mangwiro, L.; Malla, L.; Johari, M.; Ezeaka, C.; Kawaza, K.; Tillya, R.; Shamba, D.; Oden, Z. M.; Richards-Kortum, R.; Rhoda, N.; Lawn, J. E.; HIrschhorn, L. R.; Bohne, C. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite evidence-based interventions to reduce neonatal mortality, implementation gaps continue in low-resource settings. The Newborn Essential Solutions and Technologies (NEST360) alliance supports neonatal units in Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Tanzania with a package of technologies, training, data systems, and quality improvement (QI). However, wide variation in care coverage remains. This study examines the facility-level strategies used by high-performing "positive coverage outlier" hospitals to achieve and sustain high coverage of priority neonatal interventions. MethodsWe performed 74 key informant interviews and 21 focus groups across 16 hospitals in four countries. Hospitals were selected based on their coverage rates (percentage of eligible newborns receiving an intervention) for at least one of four neonatal interventions (kangaroo mother care, continuous positive airway pressure, phototherapy, hypothermia prevention). Transcripts were coded using deductive and inductive approaches to identify strategies, barriers, and facilitators of implementation. ResultsA total of 114 distinct strategies were identified. Common strategies across countries included peer-to-peer mentorship, routine data review meetings, and family education. Country-specific adaptations were also observed. For example, Malawi emphasized data-driven decision-making and Tanzania focused on infection control. Many strategies were low-cost and addressed organizational and behavioral mechanisms such as motivation, accountability, and teamwork. ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of context-sensitive implementation strategies in achieving and sustaining high coverage for neonatal interventions. Beyond program interventions, like trainings and providing medical devices, strategies fostering staff engagement, leadership support, and cultural alignment are critical. Findings offer actionable insights for scaling up neonatal care improvements within and beyond the NEST360 network. Clinical trial numberNot applicable Contributions to the literatureO_LIThis study demonstrates how implementation science principles can be applied to facility-level quality improvement efforts to generate generalizable knowledge and identify common strategies and themes that underpin successful implementation across diverse facilities and countries. C_LIO_LIThese findings highlight the variability in program implementation across facilities and countries, demonstrating that even when facilities receive the same package, success depends on context-specific adaption. This contributes to the growing evidence that effective scale-up requires flexible, locally tailored solutions in additional to a standardized implementation package. C_LIO_LIThe use of a positive outlier approach within a multi-country implementation program demonstrates a feasible and replicable method for identifying and disseminating actionable implementation strategies, and the cross-country comparative design of this study enables the identification of convergent and context-specific strategies used to improve small and sick newborn care. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 97%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 96%
- Influences on policy-formulation, decision-making, organisation and management for maternal, newborn and child health in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda: the roles and legitimacy of a multi-country network 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 96%
- Progress in Epidemic Ready Primary Health Care: Early Pilot Results from Four African Countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Uganda), December 2023 – October 2024 95%
- Factors Affecting Access to and Utilisation of Intravenous Iron to Treat Anaemia in Pregnancy in Zomba, Malawi: A Qualitative Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 96%
- Caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of the Smart Discharges Program for children with sepsis in Uganda: A descriptive qualitative study 96%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of Smart Triage combined with a quality improvement program for children presenting to facilities in Kenya and Uganda: An interrupted time series analysis 96%
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 96%
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 95%
- Mortality Outcomes in Task-Sharing for Emergency Care: Impact of Emergency Physician Supervision on Non-Physician Emergency Care in Rural Uganda 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.