Back

Mechanistic Understanding of Protein-MOF Integration through Surfactant-Driven Interfacial Design

Rashidniyaghi, E.; Khavani, M.; Coerver, C.; Liang, R.; Ravanfar, R.

2025-11-12 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.11.687871 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integration of proteins into metal-organic frameworks (Protein@MOF) represents an effective method for protein stabilization, with rising demand across material and biomedical sciences. However, the molecular mechanism of protein-MOF interactions remains unsettled due to challenges in developing a general platform to systematically investigate such interactions, hindering improvements in their chemical and physical properties. Here, we develop a surfactant-guided strategy to modulate the assembly of protein@MOF through interfacial design. We discovered that the interfacial environment between proteins and MOFs is the primary factor determining encapsulation efficiency, structural retention, and functional performance. Lipid-based non-ionic surfactants such as glycerol monooleate (GMO) increase the proteins solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), suggesting partial remodeling of the protein surface and hydration shell. GMO at the interface of protein@MOF results in a 20% improvement in protein encapsulation and a 30% increase in MOF growth rate. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations reveal domain-specific interactions between GMO and flexible surface residues on protein in a concentration-dependent manner, involving both electrostatic and hydrophobic contacts. This work offers new molecular insights into how surfactant-driven interfacial design fine-tunes the stability of protein@MOF, laying the foundation for robust alternatives to lipid nanodiscs for membrane protein stabilization, and protein-based platforms for drug-delivery, biocatalysis, and biosensing.

Published in Advanced Science (predicted rank #22) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.