Back

Asyndromic Surveillance of New York City Emergency Department Diagnoses with the Tree-Temporal Scan Statistic

Greene, S. K.; Levin-Rector, A.; Kulldorff, M.; Lall, R.

2025-11-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.11.11.25339953 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesIllness trends are typically monitored by reportable disease and syndromic surveillance systems, but unanticipated health issues might not be captured. Using diagnosis codes, the New York City Health Department developed a data mining method to detect unusual increases in emergency department (ED) visits for any reason. MethodsWe applied the tree-temporal scan statistic in TreeScan software to ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for ED visits. We searched for unusual citywide increases in ED visits or hospital admissions, over any recent time period, and at any part of and level on the ICD-10-CM tree. We conducted proof-of-concept analyses for March 2020 when COVID-19 emerged, then investigated signals detected in daily, automated analyses during April-August 2025. ResultsIf TreeScan analyses had been in place, then increasing hospital admissions for viral pneumonia (J12) would have triggered a signal on March 13, 2020, two days before widespread COVID-19 community transmission was announced. An extreme heat event in June 2025 triggered a signal for admissions for acute kidney failure (N17), prompting outreach to dialysis networks. A sustained signal for hand, foot, and mouth disease (B08.4) prompted outreach to child care programs. Other signals supported situational awareness, including a seasonal increase for swimmers ear (H60.33) and burns (T30.0) related to consumer fireworks. Practice ImplicationsTreeScan quickly detected credible increases in various diagnoses without pre-specification, from minor to severe, rare to common, acute to sustained, and foreseen to unforeseen. TreeScan can strengthen surveillance for health issues related to new pathogens, non-notifiable conditions, environmental exposures, and mass gatherings.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
2
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
4
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
15
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
22
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%