Back

CODABEILLES: A Reliable Reference Library of COI DNA Barcodes for French Wild Bees Monitoring (Apoidea: Anthophila)

Ollivier, M.; Marquisseau, A.; Dufrene, E.; Rudelle, R.; The CODABEILLES Consortium, ; Rougerie, R.; Perrard, A.; Pichon, M.

2025-11-11 ecology
10.1101/2025.11.10.687545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the Anthropocene, the decline of insect pollinators poses a significant threat to ecosystem services, particularly to wild bee populations essential for plant biodiversity and agricultural productivity. France, with 983 species, hosts one of the most diverse bee faunas in Europe, yet these species face growing pressures from habitat loss, climate change, and intensive agriculture. Addressing this crisis requires robust taxonomic frameworks and efficient species identification methods to support long-term monitoring initiatives such as the European Pollinator Monitoring Scheme, EU-PoMS. DNA barcoding, utilizing the COI-5P gene, has proven effective for species delineation and biodiversity monitoring, particularly in detecting cryptic diversity among genera with large numbers of species such as Andrena, Nomada or Lasioglossum. However, significant gaps remain in reference libraries, particularly for the species from the Mediterranean Basin. To bridge this gap, the CODABEILLES initiative was launched in 2021 to enhance barcode data for the French bee fauna. Initially, only 25% of species had barcodes from French voucher specimens, increasing to 62% when considering voucher specimens from other countries. By 2025, thanks to collaboration with sixteen specialists and institutions, CODABEILLES contributed 1477 reference barcodes, covering approximately 560 species and raising barcode coverage to 82%. When integrating data published under other initiatives over the same period the coverage reaches 94% of the French bee fauna. This dataset significantly enhances species identification accuracy and supports large-scale pollinator monitoring through metabarcoding and environmental DNA approaches. Despite the success of COI-5P barcoding, taxonomic inconsistencies persist, necessitating further integrative research. This study underscores the need for continued collaboration among taxonomists, molecular biologists, and conservationists to refine species classifications and ensure comprehensive reference databases. The improved barcode coverage provided by CODABEILLES paves the way for more accurate DNA-based monitoring of wild bee populations and their ecological interactions, crucial for guiding conservation strategies in the face of ongoing environmental change.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.6%
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
20
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
24
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%