Trends in symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults in Norway: Evidence from eight population-based surveys (1995-2024)
Kirkoen, B.; Eriksen, A. M. A.; Broderstad, A. R.; Hoye, A.; Johansson, J.; Sivertsen, B.; Lunde, E. S.; Krokstad, S.; Aakhus, E.; Langballe, E. M.; Nilsen, T. S.; Knapstad, M.; Hansen, T.; Tesli, M.; Reneflot, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIncreasing symptoms of anxiety and depression among adolescents and emerging adults are well documented, while less attention has been given to how these symptoms have evolved among adults. We aim to describe the development of symptoms of anxiety and depression in the adult population in Norway over the past decades. MethodsFor the first time, we synthesize data from all population-based, cross-sectional surveys of symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults in Norway. Data were extracted from the Living Condition Survey (1998-2012, and 2015-2019), HUNT (1995/97-2017/19), the Tromso Study (2001-2015/16), SAMINOR (2003/04-2012), Quality of Life Survey (2021-2024), the FHUS Agder (2019-2023), FHUS Oslo (2020-2024), and the Students Health and Wellbeing Study (SHoT, 2010-2022). Changes over time in symptoms were examined though sex and age stratified regression models. ResultsData from the eight population-based studies, comprise 30 separate data collections including 584 173 adults aged 18-89 years between 1995 and 2024. We observe a clear increase in symptoms of anxiety and depression among young adults, especially among young women. Among individuals in midlife, findings are mixed, with most studies indicating stability or only minor fluctuations. In contrast, the symptoms of older adults appears to have remained stable or even improved. ConclusionsResults show divergent trends in symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults. There has been an increase in symptoms among young adults, while symptoms remain stable or improved in old age. The results highlight the need for targeted preventive efforts among younger adults and for careful continued observation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19-lockdown and vulnerability factors on cognitive functioning and mental health in Italian population 95%
- Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review 95%
- Anxiety and Depression among Medical Doctors in Catalonia, Italy, and the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnoses of common mental health disorders in adults in Catalonia, Spain 95%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency of Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation Among University Students Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 93%
- General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire as a marker of low socioeconomic status and inequity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mental Illness Symptoms in Spain in the COVID-19 Crisis 94%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 93%
- Lowered quality of life in Long COVID is strongly predicted by affective symptoms and chronic fatigue syndrome which are associated with inflammatory processes during the acute infectious phase and consequent neuroimmunotoxic pathways 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness and the onset of new mental health problems in the general population: a systematic review 95%
- Social inequalities in youth mental health in Canada, 2007-2022: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study 93%
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.