LSTM-Attention-Guided Graph Neural Networks for Integrated Genotype-Environment Modeling in Maize Yield Prediction
Morshedian, A.; Domaratzki, M.
Show abstract
We present a deep-learning framework that combines an LSTM, a graph neural network (GNN), and transformer-style attention to model genotype-environment (G x E) effects for maize yield prediction. Weather data for a growing season is summarized using LSTM and encoded into a 21-dimensional embedding that is used as the environment node feature; 437,214 SNPs are summarized into 548 principal components that instantiate genotype nodes. Multi-head attention dynamically weights the edges during message passing. We compare three architectures: A (fully bipartite graph), B (A with intra-set top-k similarity within genotype and within environment), and C (B with a single learnable supernode readout that attends over all nodes after message passing). The joint representations feed a compact MLP for yield prediction. Using a forward-time split (2014-2021 train; 2022 test with unseen genotypes and unseen environments), performance improves monotonically from A to C: A (RMSE 2.7749, PCC 0.4115, R2 0.1693), B (2.3683, 0.6622, 0.4385), C (2.2120, 0.6945, 0.4823). Compared to A, C has a reduction in RMSE by 0.5629 ([~]20.3%) and an increase in PCC by 0.283 ([~]68.8%), indicating that global, content-adaptive aggregation promotes local G x E propagation. Performance of our approach remains consistent regardless of the number of genotypes per environment and has strong performance under variable or unbalanced genotype sampling expression across environments.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly Accurate Cancer Phenotype Prediction with AKLIMATE, a Stacked Kernel Learner Integrating Multimodal Genomic Data and Pathway Knowledge 93%
- A variational autoencoder trained with priors from canonical pathways increases the interpretability of transcriptome data 93%
- Towards a More General Understanding of the Algorithmic Utility of Recurrent Connections 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.