Back

Assessing the feasibility of machine learning for ancient DNA age prediction: limitations and insights

Kazanskii, M. A.; Golikova, M.; Kasianov, A.; Ivanova, A.; Suraganov, A.; Uroshlev, L.

2025-11-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.09.687346 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We investigated the possibility of estimating the age of ancient biological samples directly from their DNA damage profiles using supervised machine learning. Traditional dating methods such as radiocarbon dating, dendrochronology rely on either material context or isotope composition, while our approach exploits intrinsic molecular degradation signatures. Using damage statistics obtained from ancient DNA sequencing data, we trained several regression models to predict sample age over a temporal range of up to 10,000 years. Despite initial correlations between specific damage features and age, cross-validation and external testing revealed no statistically significant predictive signal beyond mean-based baselines. These findings indicate that, in the current formulation, DNA damage information alone is insufficient for reliable age estimation. However, this negative result provides important methodological insight: environmental and biochemical factors appear to dominate damage variation, effectively masking chronological signal. We suggest that integrating contextual data, expanding labeled datasets, and incorporating physical models of DNA decay may improve future attempts. Our study thus contributes to a transparent assessment of the limitations and prospects of DNA-based fossil dating.

Published in Biology Methods and Protocols (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.