Back

Evaluation of large language model chatbot responses to psychotic prompts

Shen, E.; Hamati, F.; Donohue, M. R.; Girgis, R.; Veenstra-VanderWeele, J.; Jutla, A.

2025-11-11 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.11.09.25339772 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThe large language model (LLM) chatbot product ChatGPT has accumulated 800 million weekly users since its 2022 launch. In 2025, several media outlets reported on individuals in whom apparent psychotic symptoms emerged or worsened in the context of using ChatGPT. As LLM chatbots are trained to align with user input, they may have difficulty responding to psychotic content. ObjectiveTo assess whether ChatGPT can reliably generate appropriate responses to prompts containing psychotic symptoms. DesignA cross-sectional study of ChatGPT responses to psychotic and control prompts, with blind clinician ratings of response appropriateness. SettingChatGPT web application accessed on 8/28-8/29/2025, testing three product versions: GPT-5 Auto (current paid default), GPT-4o (previous paid default), and "Free" (version accessible without subscription or account). Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe presented 158 unique prompts (79 control and 79 psychotic, generated based on the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes) to three product versions, yielding 474 prompt-response pairs. Blinded clinicians assigned each an appropriateness rating (0 = completely appropriate, 1 = somewhat appropriate, 2 = completely inappropriate) via a standardized rubric. We hypothesized a priori that psychotic prompts would be more likely than control prompts to elicit less appropriate responses both across and within product versions. ResultsIn the primary (across-version) analysis, psychotic prompts were 25.84 times more likely to elicit less appropriate responses with "Free" ChatGPT (95% CI 12.45 to 53.66, p < 0.001). GPT-5 Auto reduced risk somewhat (OR for interaction term 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.68, p = 0.005) yet still generated less appropriate responses at a greatly elevated rate (implied OR 8.53, 95% CI 3.05 to 23.84). In the secondary (within-version) analysis, ORs were 9.08 for GPT-5 Auto (95% CI 4.24 to 21.02), 14.15 for GPT-4o (95% CI 6.12 to 37.23) and 43.37 for "Free" (95% CI 18.44 to 112.80). In an exploratory analysis, prompts reflecting grandiosity or disorganized communication were more likely to elicit inappropriate responses than those reflecting delusions. Conclusions and RelevanceNo tested version of ChatGPT reliably generated appropriate responses to psychotic content. Brief AbstractThe large language model (LLM) chatbot product ChatGPT has accumulated 800 million weekly users since its 2022 launch. In 2025, several media outlets reported on individuals in whom apparent psychotic symptoms emerged or worsened in the context of using ChatGPT. As LLM chatbots are trained to align with user input, they may have difficulty responding to psychotic content. To assess whether ChatGPT can reliably generate appropriate responses to prompts containing psychotic symptoms, we conducted a cross-sectional study of ChatGPT responses to psychotic and control prompts, with blind clinician ratings of response appropriateness. We tested three ChatGPT product versions: GPT-5 Auto (current paid default), GPT-4o (previous paid default), and "Free" (version accessible without subscription or account), presenting each with 158 unique prompts (79 control and 79 psychotic, created based on the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes), yielding 474 prompt-response pairs. Blinded clinicians assigned each an appropriateness rating (0 = completely appropriate, 1 = somewhat appropriate, 2 = completely inappropriate) via a standardized rubric. We hypothesized a priori that psychotic prompts would be more likely than control prompts to elicit less appropriate responses both across and within product versions. We found that psychotic prompts were 25.84 times more likely to elicit less appropriate responses with "Free" ChatGPT (95% CI 12.45 to 53.66, p < 0.001). GPT-5 Auto reduced risk somewhat (OR for interaction term 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.68, p = 0.005) yet still generated less appropriate responses at a greatly elevated rate (implied OR 8.53, 95% CI 3.05 to 23.84). No tested version of Chat-GPT reliably generated appropriate responses to psychotic content. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSCan the popular large language model product ChatGPT reliably generate appropriate responses to prompts containing psychotic content? FindingsPsychotic prompts were 26 times more likely than control prompts to elicit less appropriate responses from the current free version of ChatGPT, and 9 times more likely to elicit them from the current paid version. MeaningNo tested version of ChatGPT can reliably generate appropriate responses to psychotic content.

Published in JAMA Psychiatry (predicted rank #9) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.