Back

Use of Dry Blood Spots for Identifying Hepatitis E Infections

Alvarez, C.; Nesbitt, R. C.; Asilaza, K. V.; Sattonnet, P.; Wamala, J. F.; Das, S.; Haile, M.; Rull, M.; Gignoux, E.; Albela, M.; Rumunu, J.; Eckerle, I.; Ciglenecki, I.; Azman, A. S.; Meyer, B.

2025-11-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.11.09.25339677 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccurate and accessible diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) are essential for outbreak preparedness and surveillance, particularly in low-resource settings. Dried blood spots (DBS) offer a simple, scalable alternative to serum, but their diagnostic performance for HEV remains poorly characterised. MethodsPaired DBS and serum samples were collected from suspected HEV cases during an outbreak in Bentiu, South Sudan. HEV RNA was detected and quantified by real-time RT-PCR, and anti-HEV IgM and IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. DBS performance was compared to serum across assays, and associations between DBS positivity and serum viral load were analysed using logistic regression. ResultsAmong 100 serum RT-PCR positive samples, 83 were positive by DBS (sensitivity 83.0%, 95% CI: 74.5-89.1). Ct values from DBS and serum were strongly correlated ({rho} = 0.74), and most discordances at low viral loads (Ct > 30). DBS achieved 88.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 77.8-94.2) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 91.2-100) for IgM, while IgG sensitivity and specificity reached 95.0% (95% CI: 86.3-98.6) and 97.5-100%, respectively. Results were consistent across DBS card types and age groups. ConclusionsDBS provide a reliable, practical alternative to serum for HEV diagnostics. Despite slightly reduced sensitivity at low viral loads, DBS maintained high specificity and strong correlation with serum results. Their ease of collection, storage, and transport without cold chain requirements supports their application for HEV surveillance and outbreak response in resource-limited settings. Further optimisation of elution methods to increase analyte concentration, along with improved storage conditions, could enhance diagnostic sensitivity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
16
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%