Back

Effects of true to life polyethylene terephthalate and polycaprolactone nanoparticles on macrophages under a repeated exposure mode.

Collin, V.; Villacorta, A.; Diemer, H.; CIANFERANI, S.; Marcos, R.; Hernandez, A.; Carriere, M.; Darrouzet, E.; Rabilloud, T.

2025-11-10 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.11.08.687361 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Micro and nanoplastics are pollutants which concentration in different biotopes increases continuously over time, which poses the question of their potential effects on health. In animals, these micro and nanoplastics are recognized as particulate materials and thus handled by macrophages, either directly in the case of lung exposure, or after the particles have crossed the epithelial barriers in case of oral or dermal exposure. It is thus important to study the potential effects of micro and nanoplastics on macrophages. Most studies have used an experimental scheme in which the cells of interest are exposed to a single dose of plastics, and where the readout of the studied parameters is made immediately after exposure. However, this classical experimental scheme does not take into account the impact of biopersistence, nor the potential cellular adaptation that may take place when cells are exposed repeatedly to a low dose of plastics. We thus used a repeated exposure scheme, in order to better take into account these phenomena. Within this frame, we compared the macrophages responses to a persistent nanoplastic, i.e. true-to-life polyethylene terephthalate nanoparticles and to a biodegradable nanoplastic, i.e. polycaprolactone, by a combination of proteomic and targeted experiments. Our results show that under this repeated exposure scheme, the proteome changes were of a lesser extent than under the acute exposure mode, indicating cell adaptation. However, polyethylene terephthalate nanoparticles induced oxidative stress and a pro-inflammatory response, while polycaprolactone nanoparticles induced a depression of macrophages functions, indicating harmful effects even in the repeated exposure scheme.

Published in NanoImpact · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.7%
2
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
3
Nanoscale Advances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
5
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
7
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
10
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
12
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
16
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
24
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%