Back

Fragmentation reduces vesper bat abundance and evenness in a southern Appalachian forest

Ramey, E. J.; McRae, T. R.

2025-11-10 ecology
10.1101/2025.11.08.687270 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Habitat fragmentation alters biodiversity through changes in habitat patch size, structure, and increasing distance between patches. However, if species regularly move across distances greater than those between patches, the effect of distance may approach zero. More studies of highly mobile species such as vesper bats (Vespertilionidae) are needed to clarify how such species respond to fragmentation. This study examines the impact of forest fragmentation on vesper bat community diversity in the Southeastern United States. Using mobile acoustic surveys, bats were monitored along forest transects in the Cherokee National Forest and in surrounding farmlands containing widely spaced forest fragments. The same nine vesper bat species were recorded and identified in both habitat types. Results indicate a 43% decline in vesper bat abundance in the farmland when compared to intact forest, with eight species having a higher abundance within the intact forest. Notably, Seminole bats, (Lasiurus seminolus) maintained similar abundance across habitats, suggesting species-specific responses to fragmentation. Despite identical species richness, diversity indices such as the Shannon diversity index and {beta}Shannon identified lower biodiversity in the farmland when compared to the forest. Our results indicate that despite being highly mobile, vesper bats exhibit a largely negative response to habitat fragmentation and loss. This could be due to the change of the core to edge habitat ratio, emphasizing the importance of conserving core forest habitat to sustain bat biodiversity. Observed species-specific responses to habitat fragmentation indicate a need for further research to elucidate the complexities of managing bat communities in human-modified ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.5%
2
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
13
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
14
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
21
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%