Back

Seqwin: Ultrafast Identification of Signature Sequences in Microbial Genomes

Wang, M. X.; Kille, B.; Nute, M. G.; Zhou, S.; Stadler, L. B.; Treangen, T. J.

2025-11-09 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.07.687294 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivation: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) enables rapid, cost-effective diagnostics but requires prior identification of genomic regions that allow sensitive and specific detection of target microbial groups, herein referred to as microbial signature sequences. We introduce Seqwin, an open-source framework designed to automate microbial genome signature discovery. Tens of thousands of microbial genomes are now available for a single species, limiting the application of existing manual and automated approaches for identifying signatures. Modern approaches that are capable of leveraging all available microbial genomes will ensure sensitive and accurate DNA signature identification and enable robust pathogen detection for clinical, environmental, and public health applications. Results: Seqwin builds weighted pan-genome minimizer graphs and uses a traversal algorithm to identify signature sequences that occur frequently in target genomes but remain rare in non-targets. Unlike earlier tools that depend on strict presence or absence of sequences, Seqwin accommodates natural sequence variation and scales to very large genome collections. When applied to genomes from C. difficile, M. tuberculosis, and S. enterica, Seqwin recovered more high-quality signatures than alternative methods with lower computational burden. Seqwin's analysis of nearly 15,000 S. enterica genomes yielded over 200 candidate signatures in 5 minutes. Seqwin provides an open-source solution for the long-standing need for scalable microbial signature discovery and diagnostic assay design. Availability: Seqwin is freely available for academic use (https://github.com/treangenlab/Seqwin) and can be installed via Bioconda. Benchmarking datasets, outputs, and scripts are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19176444).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.