Back

AI-assisted Image-Based Phenotyping Reveals Genetic Architecture of Pod Traits in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Boddepalli, V. N.; Jubery, T. Z.; Dutta, S.; Ganapathysubramanian, B.; Singh, A.

2025-11-08 genomics
10.1101/2025.11.06.687031 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) is a vital source of digestible proteins and is well-suited for the plant-based protein industry. In this study, we analyzed pod morphological traits in the Iowa Mungbean Diversity (IMD) panel with 372 genotypes (2022-23) with AI-assisted image phenotyping using 2,418 pod images. Pod morphological traits were extracted using deep learning image analysis, achieving excellent agreement with manual measurements (r>0.96 for pod length and seed per pod). Four complementary GWAS models identified 45 significant SNPs associated with pod curvature, length, width, and seed per pod traits. Notably, a significant SNP (5_35265704) on chromosome 1 was linked to pod dimensional traits, length, width, and curvature. A candidate gene, Vradi01g00001116, was located within the linkage disequilibrium (LD) region of this SNP, is part of the GH3 gene family, and has an Arabidopsis ortholog (AT4G27260) known for influencing organ elongation, pod, and seed development. Another SNP, 5_210437 on chromosome 2, has been found to be significantly associated with both pod length and seed per pod. A candidate gene, Vradi02g00003971, located in the LD region of this SNP, belongs to the potassium transporter family and shares homology with the HAK5 gene family (AT4G13420) in Arabidopsis, which influences pod and seed growth. Image-based measurements achieved genomic prediction accuracies ranging from 0.61 to 0.85 across various traits, exhibiting an improvement of 12-22% over manual methods. These results demonstrate the potential of AI-assisted phenomics integrated with genomic tools to accelerate selection for improved pod architecture in mungbean breeding programs across the Midwestern United States and globally.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.