Increased mutation rates and diversity are dominant features of Geobacter multiheme cytochromes
Starwalt-Lee, R.; Gralnick, J. A.; Bond, D. R.
Show abstract
Multi-heme cytochromes are the central catalysts of extracellular electron transfer and are uniquely abundant in the genomes of model organisms like Geobacter sulfurreducens. While specific functions for some multiheme cytochromes are known, the complex repertoire present in any genome makes annotation and prediction of electron transfer circuitry challenging. Here we examine patterns of conservation and rates of evolutionary change among Geobacter cytochromes that help explain these difficulties. Using the Ppc and OmcS cytochromes as test cases we find that sequence based methods of determining protein homology can be inadequate for distinguishing between cytochromes known to have differing functions. Importantly, using mutation rate analysis, we find that multi-heme cytochromes in Geobacter and Shewanella exhibit increased mutation rates, which may account for inaccurate homolog identification even between closely related organisms. Finally, an analysis of multi-heme cytochrome diversity reveals that each Geobacter genome contains a high proportion of cytochromes that are unique to that individual species, suggesting a high rate of horizontal acquisition and gene loss. These increased mutational and genetic exchange rates will need to be properly accounted for in annotation tools before we can accurately ascribe function and catalog the complex repertoire of cytochromes essential to extracellular electron transfer. ImportanceDissimilatory metal reducing bacteria are found worldwide and encode diverse multi-heme cytochromes with properties suitable for applications in bioremediation, bioenergy, and bioelectronics. We find that multi-heme cytochromes involved in extracellular electron transfer show poor conservation, with significantly higher mutation rates than other elements of the proteome. This previously undescribed characteristic will limit the efficacy of standard methods of homolog annotation and database mining currently used to identify specific multi-heme cytochromes. Our findings also suggest a vast pool of undiscovered multi-heme cytochromes exists that is constantly being acquired or exchanged.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Evidence for Formate Metabolism by Chloroflexi as the Key to Unlocking Deep Carbon in Lost City Microbial Ecosystems 96%
- Establishing Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of the Phylum Myxococcota 96%
- Genomic analysis of family UBA6911 (Group 18 Acidobacteria) expands the metabolic capacities of the phylum and highlights adaptations to terrestrial habitats 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative genomics on cultivated and uncultivated, freshwater and marine Candidatus Manganitrophaceae species implies their worldwide reach in manganese chemolithoautotrophy 97%
- High-throughput genetics enables identification of nutrient utilization and accessory energy metabolism genes in a model methanogen 96%
- Mechanisms for Electron Uptake by Methanosarcina acetivorans During Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ecophysiology of the cosmopolitan OM252 bacterioplankton (Gammaproteobacteria) 96%
- Metabolic differentiation of co-occurring Accumulibacter clades revealed through genome-resolved metatranscriptomics 96%
- Freshwater Chlorobia exhibit metabolic specialization among cosmopolitan and endemic populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Eight Unexpected Selenoprotein Families in ABC transport, in Organometallic Biochemistry in Clostridium difficile and other anaerobes, and in Methylmercury Biosynthesis. 96%
- Lack of specificity in Geobacter periplasmic electron transfer 95%
- In silico discovery of the myxosortases that process MYXO-CTERM and three novel prokaryotic C-terminal protein-sorting signals that share invariant Cys residues 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.