Back

Unlocking Scalable Ligand Residence Time Predictions with Koffee Unbinding Kinetics Simulations

Madsen, N. K.; Ziolek, R. M.; Kongsgaard, D.; Nielsen, C. F.; Norlov, A. D.; Dolciami, D.; Sacher, J. R.; Michelsen, K.; Acker, M. G.; Berglund, N. A.; Christensen, M. H.; Gronlund, A.; Husted, L.; Gloriam, D. E.; Kooistra, A. J.; Zinner, N. T.

2025-12-02 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.06.686759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A great number of drug discovery programs fail due to poor in vivo efficacy and ADMET liabilities. On- and off-target ligand residence times can act as important drivers of these problems. While modern experimental techniques have made measuring compound kinetics data more routine, there is a lack of accurate, high-throughput simulation techniques to guide compound prioritization by residence time. In this work, we introduce Koffee Unbinding Kinetics as a solution to the hitherto unanswered problem of scalable ligand-protein residence time prediction. By bypassing conventional approaches based on molecular dynamics simulations, Koffee Unbinding Kinetics performs physics-based residence time screening at the atomistic level in {approx} 1 GPU minute per complex using inexpensive hardware, a speed-up of at least 3 - 5 orders of magnitude compared to current state-of-the-art simulation approaches. Koffee Unbinding Kinetics can enhance compound selection to mitigate costly future program failures by adding fast, predictive residence time simulations to early-stage computational drug discovery pipelines. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/686759v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@120d5dcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b86b67org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@193554forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c5c6c1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.