Determining Essential priorities for Future Investigation - a National consensus Exercise in Interventional Oncology (DEFINE-IO) - A priori protocol
Chan, V. W.-S.; Graham, B.; Ng, H. H.-L.; Griffiths, S.; Kotecha, D.; Ismail, H.; Jenkins, P.; Zhong, J.; Lakshminarayan, R.; Wah, T. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionInterventional Oncology (IO), is a rapidly developing subspecialty within interventional radiology (IR), offering minimally invasive, precise and targeted cancer therapies. Despite its transformative potential, IO faces challenges in identifying critical research priorities amidst limited funding and resources. The DEFINE-IO study aims to identify the most pressing research priorities in IO to guide researchers, policy makers, and funding bodies in driving innovation and improving cancer outcomes. Methods and analysisThis study comprises two phases: a modified e-Delphi process and a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The e-Delphi process will involve three rounds, with round 1 dedicated to generating research topics, followed by rounds 2 and 3, which will focus on refining and achieving consensus on the identified topics. The final consensus will yield a list of 25 research priorities, which will be evaluated during an in-person MCDA session. These priorities will be assessed against three predefined criteria: urgency, feasibility/equipoise, and affordability, to establish a strategic roadmap for research in IO. Ethics and disseminationFormal ethics approval was deemed not necessary. Findings of the study will be presented at major conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings will also be shared with funding bodies and policymakers to help guide future research directions. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=137 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25339733v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (50K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b9a144org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10a9daforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f67deeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c5d5e4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 95%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
- Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 95%
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 94%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 93%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana 93%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 92%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 94%
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 93%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.