Back

Sex-based differences in the prevalence and determinants of anaemia among children living with HIV Southern Province of Zambia

Chakulya, M.; Chisompola, D.; Siame, L.; Hamooya, B. M.; Masenga, S. K.

2025-11-07 hematology
10.1101/2025.11.06.25339708
Show abstract

Backgroundanaemia remains a major comorbidity among children living with HIV (CLHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa, yet sex-specific risk factors are poorly characterized. This study investigated the prevalence and sex-based determinants of anaemia among CLHIV in the Southern Province, Zambia. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical records from 321 CLHIV aged 0-14 years. Data on demographic, clinical, and anthropometric variables were analysed. Sex-stratified multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with anaemia. ResultsOverall anaemia prevalence was 47.0% (151/321), with a higher, though not statistically significant, burden in males (52.6%) than females (41.9%). Younger age was a strong, independent risk factor across both sexes. Distinct sex-specific determinants were identified. In males, cotrimoxazole (CTX) use during treatment was associated with increased odds of anaemia (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR=3.04; 95% CI: 0.95-9.74). Conversely, among females, the type of caregiver was a significant factor; care provided by an aunt was associated with 90% lower odds of anaemia compared to other arrangements (AOR=0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-0.90). Poor anthropometric indices (height and weight) were significantly associated with anaemia in both sexes. ConclusionsThe study findings reveal a high prevalence of anaemia among CLHIV in Zambia, with nuanced sex-based differences in its determinants. The findings advocate for differentiated, gender-sensitive intervention strategies. For boys, careful review of CTX prophylaxis is warranted, while for girls, enhancing supportive caregiving environments may be protective. Integrating these sex-specific approaches into paediatric HIV programs is crucial for reducing the anaemia burden and improving clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 3%
3.4× avg
2
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Wiley · based on 15 published papers
#1
209× avg
3
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
#1
151× avg
4
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
5
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 8%
3.2× avg
6
British Journal of Haematology
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.6%
30× avg
7
Public Health in Practice
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
26× avg
8
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Elsevier BV · based on 115 published papers
Top 11%
2.9× avg
10
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 81%
0.9%
11
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 11%
1.6× avg
12
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
13
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 19%
0.7%
14
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 51%
0.7%
15
Leukemia
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
8.8× avg
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 166 published papers
Top 12%
0.7%