Back

Sex-based differences in the prevalence and determinants of anaemia among children living with HIV Southern Province of Zambia

Chakulya, M.; Chisompola, D.; Siame, L.; Hamooya, B. M.; Masenga, S. K.

2025-11-07 hematology
10.1101/2025.11.06.25339708 medRxiv
Show abstract

Backgroundanaemia remains a major comorbidity among children living with HIV (CLHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa, yet sex-specific risk factors are poorly characterized. This study investigated the prevalence and sex-based determinants of anaemia among CLHIV in the Southern Province, Zambia. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical records from 321 CLHIV aged 0-14 years. Data on demographic, clinical, and anthropometric variables were analysed. Sex-stratified multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with anaemia. ResultsOverall anaemia prevalence was 47.0% (151/321), with a higher, though not statistically significant, burden in males (52.6%) than females (41.9%). Younger age was a strong, independent risk factor across both sexes. Distinct sex-specific determinants were identified. In males, cotrimoxazole (CTX) use during treatment was associated with increased odds of anaemia (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR=3.04; 95% CI: 0.95-9.74). Conversely, among females, the type of caregiver was a significant factor; care provided by an aunt was associated with 90% lower odds of anaemia compared to other arrangements (AOR=0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-0.90). Poor anthropometric indices (height and weight) were significantly associated with anaemia in both sexes. ConclusionsThe study findings reveal a high prevalence of anaemia among CLHIV in Zambia, with nuanced sex-based differences in its determinants. The findings advocate for differentiated, gender-sensitive intervention strategies. For boys, careful review of CTX prophylaxis is warranted, while for girls, enhancing supportive caregiving environments may be protective. Integrating these sex-specific approaches into paediatric HIV programs is crucial for reducing the anaemia burden and improving clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.