Back

Validation and Refinement of Operator Syndrome in Active-Duty Special Operations Forces

Adams, S. W.; Frueh, B. C.; Sabangan, J.; Pawlowski, C.; Oh, R.; Pugach, C.; Harris, O.

2025-11-07 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.11.06.25339692 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOperator Syndrome (OS) describes the unique constellation of symptoms observed in special operations forces (SOF) following a) chronic and repetitive exposure to high-tempo tasks that are physically demanding and involve extreme threats to physical safety, b) are compounded by potentially traumatic events, and/or c) traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study sought to empirically test the validity of OS and refine OS to reflect the latest evidence. MethodsActive-duty, treatment seeking SOF with significant histories of TBI who participated in VA Palo Altos Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (n = 202) completed a battery of multimodal and multidimensional assessments as part of their clinical care. OS was evaluated according to the Middle-Out Approach, using both variable-centered (exploratory factor analysis [EFA]) and person-centered (latent class analysis [LCA]) methods with a closer examination using LCA of unique mental health presentations. ResultsA one-factor and one-class structure across 9 domains of OS was indicated by EFA and LCA, respectively. Meeting [≥] 5 domains (Headaches [.679] Mental Health [.634], Pain [.560], Sensory [.524], and Sleep [.441] Disruptions) accounted for 68.9% of the variance in OS outcomes, suggesting a suitable criterion for detecting OS, which was experienced by 180 (89.1%) participants. Unique mental health presentations of Dysphoric Arousal (47.5%) and Hyperarousal (28.7%) were more common than traditionally recognized presentations of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (23.8%). ConclusionsThis study provides the first empirical validation of OS as a unitary construct, as well as evidence of the core features of OS and evidence that OS can provide unique utility beyond current psychiatric diagnoses. Criterion A-C for detecting OS are recommended. Further precision in assessing the systemic influences of OS can help triage effective integrative treatments for OS in SOF personnel.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.