Identification of Therapeutic Gene Targets in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Hybrid Approach Integrating Semidefinite Programming, Boolean Simulation, and Druggability Analysis
MONTEIRO, S. A.; de Carvalho, L. A. V.; da Silva, F. A. B.
Show abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a significant clinical challenge due to the absence of well-established molecular targets and resistance to conventional therapies. Identifying synergistic combinations of therapeutic targets requires computational approaches that integrate topological network analysis, experimental validation, and clinical applicability. This work proposes a hybrid methodology that combines Semidefinite Programming (SDP) for identification of critical nodes in gene regulatory networks, Boolean simulation for quantification of perturbation efficacy, and systematic literature validation with focus on druggability and synergy. We constructed a core regulatory network of 13 genes representing key nodes in STAT3, PI3K/AKT, and p53 signaling pathways, which are frequently deregulated in TNBC. We applied three complementary SDP formulations (Max-Cut, Influence Maximization, and Spectral Clustering) to identify candidate targets, followed by stochastic Boolean simulation for calculation of the Therapeutic Index (TI). We integrated a practical applicability scoring system that considers druggability, clinical evidence, specificity, and TNBC validation. Our analysis identified the combination STAT3 + BCL2 as the most promising therapeutic pair, with an applicability score of 0.905 and average druggability of 0.85. This finding is strongly supported by extensive experimental evidence demonstrating that STAT3 directly regulates BCL2 transcription in breast cancer cells. We demonstrate a clear methodological evolution from previous approaches: from 5 genes (Tilli et al., 2016, druggability 0.32) to 3 genes ([9], druggability 0.40) and finally to 2 genes (our work, druggability 0.85), representing a 166% increase in druggability and 60% reduction in complexity. The proposed methodology offers a systematic and reproducible framework for prioritization of therapeutic targets with focus on clinical applicability, contributing to rational development of combination therapies in TNBC.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Survey and Systematic Assessment of Computational Methods for Drug Response Prediction 95%
- Feature Extraction Approaches for Biological Sequences: A Comparative Study of Mathematical Models 94%
- Blood-based transcriptomic signature panel identification for cancer diagnosis: Benchmarking of feature extraction methods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Through Repurposing Metabolic and Immune Inhibitors : A Theoretical Study 97%
- Optimizing Therapeutic Targets For Breast Cancer Using Boolean Network Models 96%
- Exploring vulnerable building blocks in protein-protein interaction networks of breast tumor and adjacent normal tissues 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiscale Analysis And Validation Of Effective Drug Combinations Targeting Driver Kras Mutations In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 94%
- Multi-run Concrete Autoencoder to Identify Prognostic lncRNAs for 12 Cancers 94%
- Dissecting Response to Cancer Immunotherapy by Applying Bayesian Network Analysis to Flow Cytometry Data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.