RNA editing-based biomarker blood test for the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: results of the EDIT-B consortium study
Weissmann, D.; Salvetat, N.; Cayzac, C.; Checa Robles, F.; Vetter, D.; Walczer-Baldinazzo, L.; Ruggeri, G.; Ferrari, M.; Miranda-Mendizabal, A.; Zambrano, J.; Zarp, J.; Gimenez-Palomo, A.; Valenti, M.; Haro, J. M.; Kessing, L. V.; Henry, C.; Vieta, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundDifferentiating bipolar disorder (BD) from major depressive disorder (MDD) during depressive episodes represents one of the most critical challenges in clinical psychiatry as patients may not recall prior hypomanic or manic episodes. RNA editing biomarkers combined with AI may improve diagnostic accuracy and support personalized therapeutic approaches. MethodsThe assay used is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) blood test based on 8 genes that leverages adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing signatures to aid in the differentiation of BD from MDD. A set of RNA-editing blood biomarkers within these 8 genes was previously identified and published. In this multicenter European study, we assessed the performance of three distinct RNA editing-based algorithms developed prior to this project. Sequencing data were processed via a secure HDS-certified platform by central clinical laboratory and the results for each algorithm were compared against physicians diagnosis to evaluate diagnostic performance. ResultsAcross 426 patients with a current major depressive episode recruited from four European centers, the three algorithms demonstrated robust diagnostic performance. Algorithm A284, exhibited the strongest results and highest performance, with high sensitivity (82.6%) and specificity (80.3%) across sites and patient subgroups, thus reproducing the findings and performance obtained on a previous independent cohort. ConclusionThis study validates A-to-I RNA editing signatures coupled with AI as a reliable approach to distinguish BD from MDD highlighting the clinical utility of the assay and algorithm A284 as an innovative, robust, complementary diagnostic tool.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 96%
- Blood epigenome-wide association studies of suicide attempt in adults with bipolar disorder 95%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Prevalence of Cannabis Use Disorders among U.S. Veterans with and without Psychiatric Disorders Between 2005 and 2019 92%
- Progesterone/Estradiol Ratio Is Related to Real-Life Alcohol Consumption in Alcohol Use Disorder in a Sex- and Menstrual Cycle Phase-Dependent Manner 91%
- Reduced brain responsiveness to emotional stimuli with escitalopram but not psilocybin therapy for depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetics of the mood disorder spectrum: genome-wide association analyses of over 185,000 cases and 439,000 controls 94%
- Atypical depression is associated with a distinct clinical, neurobiological, treatment response and polygenic risk profile 94%
- Descriptives and genetic correlates of eating disorder diagnostic transitions and presumed remission in the Danish registry 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential Serum Levels of CACNA1C, Circadian Rhythm and Stress Response Molecules in Subjects with Bipolar Disorder: Associations with Genetic and Clinical Factors 94%
- Individual Deviations from Normative Electroencephalographic Connectivity Predict Antidepressant Response 94%
- Acylcarnitine Metabolomic Profiles Inform Clinically-Defined Major Depressive Phenotypes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.