Back

Integrating Biological and Machine Learning Models for Rainbow Trout Growth: Balancing Accuracy and Interpretability

Fulton, L.; Lyu, P.

2025-11-06 ecology
10.1101/2025.11.04.686633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasive species management demands predictive models that balance accuracy with ecological interpretability. Traditional approaches often fail to capture complex environmental interactions. We evaluated hybrid frameworks integrating biological and machine learning models for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) growth in the Lower Colorado River. Using ten years of tag-recapture data and environmental covariates, we assessed traditional and Bayesian von Bertalanffy (VBGM) and Gompertz models, Random Forests, XGBoost, LightGBM, Support Vector Regression, Neural Networks, and ensemble approaches through comprehensive probabilistic comparisons. Our results reveal substantial improvements from incorporating environmental context and advanced modeling. Top methods achieved 70 to 80 percent error reductions compared to baseline models, equivalent to 45 to 70 mm improvements or 20 to 32 percent of mean fish length. A stacked ensemble of XGBoost and the VBGM achieved optimal performance (RMSE = 15.96 mm, R2 = 0.966), demonstrating complete stochastic dominance across the posterior. Gradient boosting models formed a strong second tier, with LightGBM (9 dominances) and XGBoost (8 dominances) leading this group. Bayesian Model Averaging achieved similar accuracy while explicitly quantifying uncertainty. Even traditional mechanistic models improved markedly, up to 80 percent, when enhanced with covariates and Bayesian estimation. Feature importance analysis identified (on average) initial length, time at large, and weight at release as key predictors. The stacked ensemble dominated baseline models in over 99 percent of posterior samples, confirming its robustness. These findings establish hybrid ensemble frameworks as powerful tools for ecological forecasting, uniting predictive performance with mechanistic insight critical to conservation decision-making. The methodology provides a generalizable template for ecological systems where both accuracy and interpretability are essential. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=97 SRC="FIGDIR/small/686633v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12c22c4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9e7796org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bd59cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@524a67_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.