Multi-ancestry epigenome wide association study of generalized anxiety disorder
Gupta, P.; Liu, S.; Galimberti, M.; Beck, S.; Adhikari, K.; Dao, C.; Nunez, Y. Z.; Overstreet, C.; Bright, U.; Stein, M. B.; Pathak, G. A.; Shen, X.; Gelernter, J.; Levey, D. F.
Show abstract
Epigenetic studies face persistent challenges related to small sample sizes, particularly when using epigenome-wide array technologies. Presumably it is this limitation that has hindered the discovery of replicable and robust findings, much like the early struggles of genome-wide association studies. To address this gap, we conducted one of the largest epigenetic investigations of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using 43,504 participants data from the Million Veteran Program. Our analysis assessed differential DNA methylation between GAD cases and controls across three major genetic ancestry groups: European (EUR), African (AFR), and Latin American (AMR). We identified 49 CpG sites reaching epigenome-wide significance across these ancestries. However, when controlling for smoking either by adjusting for smoking status or restricting analyses to non-smokers in the EUR group only 2 and 5 significant CpG sites remained significant, respectively. To explore the predictive utility of these findings, we constructed methylation risk scores using a clumping and correlation method. The scores showed significant association with GAD phenotype in the leave-one out cross-validation within the MVP cohort but failed to replicate the association in an independent sample from Scotland. This may reflect insufficient power in the follow-up cohort, the effects of unmeasured confounding variables, or other unmeasured heterogeneity. Our findings underscore both the promise and the ongoing limitations of large-scale epigenetic studies, particularly the need for replication efforts and improved control of environmental confounders. Continued expansion of sample sizes, stratified analyses by ancestry, and careful consideration of lifestyle-related and other covariates will be essential in advancing the reliability and interpretability of peripheral epigenetic markers in psychiatric phenotypes like GAD.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood epigenome-wide association studies of suicide attempt in adults with bipolar disorder 94%
- Mendelian randomization integrating GWAS and eQTL data revealed genes pleiotropically associated with major depressive disorder 94%
- Role of Inflammation in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders, Affect, and Cognition: Genetic and Non-Genetic Findings in the Lifelines Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of 17 novel epigenetic biomarkers associated with anxiety disorders using differential methylation analysis followed by machine learning-based validation 95%
- Meta-analysis of longitudinal epigenome-wide association studies of military cohorts reveals multiple CpG sites associated with post-traumatic stress disorder 93%
- The association of DNA methylation with body mass index: distinguishing between predictors and biomarkers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intergenerational transmission of complex traits and the offspring methylome 93%
- Polygenic prediction of major depressive disorder and related traits in African ancestries UK Biobank participants 92%
- Epigenome-wide association study of self-reported antidepressant use in Generation Scotland implicates the innate immune system 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- "The Heidelberg Five" Personality Dimensions: Genome-wide Associations, Polygenic Risk for Neuroticism, and Psychopathology 20 Years after Assessment 93%
- Epigenome-wide analysis uncovers a blood-based DNA methylation biomarker of lifetime cannabis use. 91%
- Polygenic risk scores for psychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits and diseases highlight possible genetic overlaps with suicide attempt and treatment-emergent suicidal ideation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.