Back

Young males in crisis: Pathways, usage and acceptability of an online messenger based psychosocial counselling service

Hug, J.; Kohls, E.; Endres, K. J.; Eckert, M.; Wundrack, R.; Saee, S.; Pougin, J.; da Silva Prado, A.; Rummel-Kluge, C.

2025-11-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.11.04.25339230
Show abstract

IntroductionBoys and young men face an elevated risk of mental health problems and suicidality, yet they remain less likely than their female peers to seek professional help. Online counselling services such as krisenchat offer low-threshold support and may help reduce gender-specific barriers, but little is known about how young men use these services. ObjectiveThis study investigates male krisenchat users in comparison to other users, focusing on demographics, utilization patterns, satisfaction, chat topics, and barriers to help-seeking behavior, in order to generate insights for improving mental health support for young men. MethodsAnonymized data were obtained from n = 29,387 krisenchat users between January and December 2023. After data cleaning, the final sample comprised of N = 9,584 participants. Demographic information, utilization behavior, suicidality, and use of professional help services were documented by counsellors, while user satisfaction, recommendation rates, and emotional distress were assessed through voluntary surveys following consultation. ResultsYoung males accounted for 19.9% of krisenchat users, were on average older than female users and were less likely to have been in prior treatment. Male users sent fewer messages, accessed the service during late-night hours more often than females, and tended to find the service via search engines rather than institutional or social media channels. Compared to female users, they were less likely to disclose self-harm, family problems, or sexual violence, but more likely to bring up sexuality and LGBTQIA+ topics. Importantly, no gender difference was found for suicidality. Despite differences in some utilization patterns, acceptability outcomes -- including reductions in distress, satisfaction, and likelihood of recommending the service -- were comparable across genders, suggesting equivalent counselling benefits once engaged. ConclusionsDigital crisis services like krisenchat hold potential for reducing gender disparities in mental health support. However, targeted strategies to improve visibility, adapt communication styles, and strengthen follow-up pathways are essential to increase engagement and sustained help-seeking among young men. Study RegistrationDRKS00026671

Matching journals

1
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
203× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 49%
10.3%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 72 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
5
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 24%
4.6%
6
BJPsych Open
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.4%
52× avg
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.3%
33× avg
8
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
9
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.6%
35× avg
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 5%
4.4× avg
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 7%
3.4× avg
12
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 21 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
13
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
14
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Elsevier BV · based on 22 published papers
Top 0.9%
29× avg
15
Psychological Medicine
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 52 published papers
Top 5%
4.9× avg
16
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
17
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.8%
23× avg
18
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 1.0%
19× avg
19
Schizophrenia Research
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
20
Sexually Transmitted Infections
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 1%
7.0× avg
21
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 5%
3.9× avg
22
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
9.2× avg
23
JMIR Research Protocols
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
5.5× avg
24
BMJ Mental Health
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
25
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 84%
0.8%
26
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Public Health
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 8%
3.2× avg
28
JAMA Psychiatry
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
29
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg