Back

Wearable Sleep Measures May Improve Machine Learning Prediction of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Engagement Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Zawada, S.; Faust, L.; Enayati, M.; Madigan, N.; Winham, S.; Benzo, R.; Fortune, E.

2025-11-06 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.11.02.25339248 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVETo evaluate whether incorporating baseline sleep measures from a wrist-worn activity monitor in machine learning (ML) models improved the prediction of 12-week engagement with home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PATIENTS AND METHODSAmong participants with a COPD exacerbation (n=124), sleep measures were collected for 1 week before HBPR and processed (1) using a validated Tudor-Locke algorithm and (2) applying partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to generate the Composite Sleep Health Score. Engagement was defined as completion of one or more recommended activities per week for the 12-week duration. Nested model comparisons for logistic regression, SVM, decision tree, and naive bayes ML models were performed to determine if including sleep measures improved engagement prediction. RESULTSIn models adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, current smoker status, modified Medical Research Council score, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the inclusion of the Composite Sleep Health Score significantly improved the prediction of 12-week engagement only in SVM models (AUC 0.716; p=0.010). Specificity (18.2%) and accuracy (67.7%) also improved by 20.4% and 2.5%, respectively. Including the Score in the logistic regression model yielded the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.721). CONCLUSIONThese proof-of-concept findings support additional investigation into the use of wearable-derived sleep measures in parametric ML models to improve screening for HBPR eligibility, identifying patients who will clinically benefit from fully remote PR. Future researchers should carefully select predictors when elucidating the link between wearable sleep measures and HBPR outcomes in COPD patients.

Published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.