Tuned to explore: Increased phasic responses to auditory targets and novelty in children regardless of induced tonic arousal
Mathieu, A.; Schöllkopf, U.; Chen, S.; Widmann, A.; Wetzel, N.; Bidet-Caulet, A.
Show abstract
The ability to focus on relevant information while ignoring distractions is critical during childhood, as it supports learning, social interaction, and adaptation to changing environments. This attentional balance is thought to depend in part on arousal regulation, mediated by the activity of the locus coeruleus norepinephrine (LC-NE) system. Moderate levels of arousal are typically associated with optimal cognitive performance. However, the interaction between arousal and attention remains poorly understood in humans, especially during development. In this study, we investigated whether experimentally modulating tonic arousal, the baseline level of physiological alertness, affects attentional processing in children (N = 44, aged 6-8) and adults (N = 46, aged 18-35). Participants performed an active auditory three-stimulus (standard, novel, target) oddball task, designed to assess selective attention to target tones and distraction by novel sounds. Prior to each task block, tonic arousal was manipulated using music or videos varying in arousing content. Physiological responses were recorded continuously (skin conductance, pupil dilation, heart rate) to index both tonic arousal and transient, phasic changes in arousal triggered by task events. While tonic arousal modulation was successful, as confirmed by skin conductance levels, Bayesian analyses provided evidence for no effect of this modulation on subsequent attentional processing. Importantly, children generally exhibited stronger phasic arousal responses, particularly to task-irrelevant novel sounds, reflecting less mature regulation of attention and arousal. These findings show developmental differences in physiological responses to unexpected environmental stimuli and provide physiological evidence of increased distractibility during childhood.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The interplay of spontaneous pupil-size fluctuations and EEG power in near-threshold detection 96%
- Sensory suppression and increased neuromodulation during actions disrupt memory encoding of unpredictable self-initiated stimuli 96%
- Word stress representations are language specific: evidence from event-related brain potentials 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Correlates of Statistical Learning in Developmental Dyslexia: An Electroencephalography Study 96%
- Dissociating the effect of reward uncertainty and timing uncertainty on neural indices of reward prediction errors: A reward positivity (RewP) event-related potential (ERP) study 94%
- Alpha and Beta Oscillations Mediate the Effect of Motivation on Neural Coding of Cognitive Flexibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.