Back

Variation of multiple plant defenses and herbivory reveal different patterns of adaptation across a productivity gradient.

Herschberger, J. E.; Calixto, E. S.; Campbell, V. R.; Maron, J. L.; Hahn, P. G.

2025-11-03 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.31.684923 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants with large geographic distributions experience varying biotic and abiotic conditions across their geographic range that can influence plant defense traits among plant populations. It is often the case that more productive regions support higher herbivore numbers. Yet whether this results in greater herbivore pressure and stronger plant defenses in these populations compared to populations inhabiting less productive regions is uncertain. Here we quantified defense traits and herbivory of Solanum carolinense L. across a large productivity gradient that spans its entire north-south range (29-44{degrees} N), using both field observations (33 populations; [~]14 plants per population) and a common garden experiment (15 populations; [~]4 plants per population). We examined the effects of productivity on 1) plant defense traits (specific leaf area, trichome density and glycoalkaloid concentration), 2) herbivory, and 3) the correlation among traits and herbivory in field and common garden plants. Trichome density and herbivory were higher for S. carolinense at the center of its range, while glycoalkaloid concentrations were negatively associated with productivity both in the field and in the common garden. In the field, plants with higher glycoalkaloid production experienced reduced herbivory, but there was no association with plant defense traits and herbivory in the common garden. Overall, these findings suggest that different types of defensive traits within a single species may follow different ecological and evolutionary trends and highlight the need for trait-specific considerations when applying plant defense hypotheses at the intraspecific level.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
6
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
7
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
8
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
17
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
18
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
25
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%