Back

Dynamic Stiffening to Improve Vasculogenesis of hiPSC-Derived Endothelial Progenitors

Stern, B.; Larsen, B.; Halwachs, K.; Cheng, K.; Tran, D.; Parker, P.; Momtahan, N.; Baker, A.; Peppas, N.; Rosales, A.; Zoldan, J.

2025-10-31 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.30.685698 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple groups have reported on the impact of hydrogel stiffness on vascular network formation in vitro, with overall findings indicating that less stiff hydrogels better support vasculogenesis. However, the majority of this research utilized hydrogels with static stiffness, even though vasculogenesis occurs in tandem with changes in extracellular matrix material properties. To that end, we hypothesize that dynamic modulation of hydrogel stiffness during the process of vasculogenesis, recapitulating changes observed during embryonic development, would improve vascular network formation. Using our Collagen I/Norbornene-modified hyaluronic acid hydrogel system, we swelled in additional crosslinker and photoinitiator and exposed the hydrogel to UV light, enabling hydrogel stiffening at user-defined time points with no significant effect on cell viability. We observed that in situ stiffening at early time points, prior to the onset of significant cell migration, resulted in more robust vascular network formation relative to unstiffened controls, while stiffening at later time points disrupted existing vascular networks. These trends continued in in vivo experiments in nude mice, with cell-laden hydrogels stiffened at early time points resulting in improved blood flow, while those stiffened at later time points had the opposite effect. We hypothesized that this was due to differential impacts of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation following in situ stiffening, as supplementation with a Rho kinase inhibitor, downstream of FAK, partially reversed the effects of in situ stiffening. Taken together, this research demonstrates the benefits of incorporating dynamic cues into hydrogel design to create more physiologically relevant vasculature.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
11
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
12
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
15
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
18
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%