Back

Ecological niche modeling reveals habitat differentiation and climatic vulnerability in two imperiled, sympatric southern Appalachian carnivorous plants

Chang, N.; Eserman, L.; Carmichael, A.; Smith, A. B.; Loy, X.; Coffey, E. E. D.; Ojacastro, J.

2025-10-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.30.685572 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PREMISEUnderstanding the habitat requirements of imperiled flora is critical for informing ex situ conservation practices, designing effective reintroduction strategies, and understanding how climate change will impact such species, especially in montane regions with high levels of environmental heterogeneity. In southern Appalachia, USA, the Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant (Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii) and Mountain Purple Pitcher Plant (Sarracenia purpurea var. montana) inhabit overlapping ranges. These taxa rarely co-occur in the same mountain bogs but frequently hybridize at sites where they do co-occur. METHODSWe assessed patterns of climatic niche differentiation in these imperiled taxa to explore whether they naturally co-occur or may have been brought into secondary contact through human translocations. In addition, we constructed ecological niche models to evaluate the comparative availability of suitable habitat for each taxon under present and future climates. RESULTSWe 1) find evidence that the two taxa inhabit distinct niches, and 2) predict that current populations of Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii will experience climates markedly different from those it currently inhabits in the future, while 3) suitable habitat for S. purpurea var. montana will remain comparatively stable and may expand in its current range. CONCLUSIONSDespite high spatial overlap, these two related taxa exhibit divergent climatic niches, resulting in highly different management needs and conservation approaches. We raise concerns about the future of mountain bog plant assemblages, and the rare species they include, under climate change.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.2%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
6
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
12
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
13
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
14
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
17
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
18
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
20
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%