MAX-EVAL-11: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Full-Spectrum ICD-11 Medical Coding
Singh, U.; Deshwal, S.; Dube, N.; Sharma, A.
Show abstract
MAX-EVAL-11 is constructed by converting MIMIC-III discharge summaries from ICD-9 to ICD-11 codes through systematic mapping, creating a synthetic diagnosis dataset of 10,000 clinical notes with comprehensive ICD-11 annotations spanning the complete taxonomy. Unlike existing partial-taxonomy benchmarks that rely on traditional precision-recall metrics, MAX-EVAL-11 introduces a clinically-informed evaluation framework that assigns weighted reward points based on code relevance ranking and diagnostic specificity. This ranking-based scoring system accounts for the varying clinical importance of correctly identifying primary diagnoses versus secondary conditions, better reflecting real-world medical coding accuracy requirements. Our comprehensive evaluation across state-of-the-art LLMs reveals significant performance variations: Claude 4 Sonnet achieves a weighted score of 0.433 with clinical precision of 43.3%, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet attains 0.396 with 37.2% clinical precision. Gemini Flash demonstrates a weighted score of 0.341 with 31.5% clinical precision. These results reveal substantial performance gaps even in advanced foundation models, underscoring the complexity of comprehensive ICD-11 coding and the need for specialized medical AI systems beyond general-purpose LLMs. The benchmark provides standardized evaluation through our novel weighted scoring methodology that prioritizes diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance over simple code-matching metrics. MAX-EVAL-11 addresses critical gaps in medical AI evaluation infrastructure by supporting the transition from legacy ICD-9 systems to ICD-11, facilitating development of clinically validated automated coding solutions that can handle real-world diagnostic complexity at scale.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medication information extraction using local large language models 96%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 96%
- EHR-QC: A streamlined pipeline for automated electronic health records standardisation and preprocessing to predict clinical outcomes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 96%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
- Evaluation of Patient-Level Retrieval from Electronic Health Record Data for a Cohort Discovery Task 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.