Back

The costs and benefits of an early access scheme for oncology medicines in Ireland

Morris, K.; Pennington, M.; Whitelegg, C.; Parkes, L.; Mahon, R.

2025-10-31 health economics
10.1101/2025.10.30.25339127 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccess to new oncology medicines is subject to delays in many countries due to lengthy appraisal processes. This study examines the cost to the Irish healthcare system of implementing a cost- sharing agreement to expedite access to oncology medicines. MethodsThe hypothetical cost of implementing an early access scheme in Ireland was estimated for oncology medicines commencing appraisal in 2022. The scheme would have required the manufacturer to cover the cost for the first 180-day period and provide a further rebate if costs per patient over the whole duration of access exceeded those that would have arisen from the finally agreed price. Costs of the new medicine and savings arising from any therapies displaced were estimated on a daily basis using data published in the technical summaries of the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Ireland (NCPE) assessment for each medicine. ResultsThe scheme would have reduced the time patients waited to access oncology medicines by more than two years on average. Assuming new medicines attract a discount of 30% at reimbursement and that medicines with an existing agreement are subject to a 30% discount, and that a further discount of 10% would be negotiated at reimbursement for the new indication, the costs to the government over the duration of the scheme would have been {euro}61.9m. Earlier access would have generated an additional 1,621 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) over the lifetime of patients accessing the scheme, after discounting. Costs were sensitive to assumptions on discounts negotiated at reimbursement. Costs fell substantially if patients with private insurance were assumed to access care through that insurance. ConclusionProtracted assessment times lead to substantial health losses to patients with cancer in Ireland. A cost-sharing scheme would accelerate access to new treatments by more than two years and at costs which are unlikely to exceed {euro}62m.

Published in BMC Health Services Research (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
BMC Health Services Research · published here
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.8%
6
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Journal of Medical Economics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
8
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
11
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
12
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
22
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 81%
0.5%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%