Back

Fatigue Symptoms Influence Effort-Based Decision-Making in Major Depressive Disorder

Steward, G.; Culbreth, A.; Goes, F.; Chib, V.

2025-10-31 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.10.30.25338913 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFatigue is a central symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD). Research in healthy individuals has shown that heightened feelings of fatigue are associated with a reduced willingness to exert effort. However, it remains unclear how fatigue affects effort-based decision-making in individuals with MDD. In this study, we explore how cognitive effort is traded for rewards in MDD and how feelings of fatigue and depressed mood symptoms influence this decision-making process. MethodsHealthy participants (n = 26) and individuals with MDD (n = 18) took part in a forced-choice paradigm, where they decided to perform either a low-effort cognitive effort task for a small reward or a more cognitively effortful task for a larger reward. Participants also completed the Beck Depression Inventory and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, which were used in a factor analysis to generate combined scores for depressed mood and fatigue for each participant. These factor scores were then incorporated into hierarchical mixed-effects models of choice data to explain behavioral differences between participants with MDD. ResultsOur findings reveal that individuals with MDD exhibited significantly higher preferences for low-effort/low-reward options compared to their healthy counterparts. This difference was linked to increased feelings of fatigue, which raised the perceived cost of cognitive effort. Variations in fatigue questionnaire scores showed stronger associations with effort-based choice behavior than those from questionnaires assessing depressive mood, indicating that fatigue is a key symptom with specific ties to effort in MDD. ConclusionsThese findings illuminate how fatigue might lead to decreases in goal-directed behavior in MDD, thereby deepening our understanding of diminished motivation in MDD and suggesting potential pathways for more effective treatment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
3
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
5
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
6
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
8
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
13
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%