Barriers and facilitators to implementing DREAMS:START intervention for sleep disturbance in dementia within the NHS: A pre-implementation study
Mehta, V.; Rapaport, P.; Livingston, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundSleep disturbances are common in people living with dementia and negatively affect them and their family carers. Non-pharmacological interventions like DREAMS:START (Dementia Related Manual for Sleep: Strategies for Relatives) offer potential benefits but are not yet implemented widely in NHS practice. AimsTo explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing DREAMS:START in UK NHS dementia services, from the perspective of healthcare professionals and intervention facilitators, using qualitative interviews. MethodWe interviewed 19 NHS staff - (n=10) staff with no prior DREAMS:START experience and (n=9) DREAMS:START facilitators using semi-structured interviews and analysed data using reflexive thematic analysis, organized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Ethical approval was granted by the London-Camden and Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 20/LO/0894). ResultsFive key themes emerged: 1) perceived need for interventions targeting sleep in dementia; 2) importance of evidence and cost-effectiveness; 3) influence of service manager attitudes and support; 4) inter-professional interconnectedness and training; and 5) staff capacity and attitudes toward change. Participants highlighted the need for flexible, personalised delivery, robust evidence, training, supervision, and local champions to facilitate adoption. ConclusionsImplementation of DREAMS:START in NHS services is feasible but organisational barriers need addressing to enhance staff capacity, and promote evidence-based, cost-effective practices. Findings from this study will inform strategies for scaling up the intervention to improve sleep outcomes for people with dementia and their carers.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 96%
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 96%
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 97%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 94%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 93%
- Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 94%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurse-physician Communication around Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Home Residents 94%
- Mortality of Care Home Residents and Community-Dwelling Controls During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Matched Cohort Study 88%
- Changing dynamics of COVID-19 deaths during the SARS-CoV2 B.1.617.2 (Delta variant) outbreak in England and Wales: Reduced COVID-19 deaths among the Care Home residents 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.