Back

Deep learning on 3D ECG geometry predicts ischemia

Bermejo Valdes, A. J.

2025-10-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.10.29.25339046 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThree-dimensional (3D) electrocardiography (ECG) is a recent methodological advance that extends the dimensionality of the standard ECG, enabling geometric descriptors that capture acute ischemia. Integrating these descriptors with deep learning (DL) may improve the discrimination between ischemic and non-ischemic states and promote the clinical translation of 3D ECG analysis. MethodsECGs from seventeen patients with acute left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis (>50 %) were obtained from the PTB Diagnostic ECG Database (PhysioNet). Pre- and post-catheterization recordings were analyzed in 2D and 3D (V3, V6, time) over the QRS end-T onset interval. Geometric descriptors included perimeter, curvature, three almost-curvature variants, and a newly defined torsion metric. Statistical analyses comprised univariate, bivariate, and multivariate tests (PERMANOVA), complemented by DL classification using a residual multilayer perceptron with patient-wise cross-validation, isotonic calibration, and logistic meta-blending, adopting a significance level of = 0.01 (99 % confidence) to ensure inference stability given the limited sample size. ResultsFour descriptors changed significantly after revascularization (P2D,V 6t,{kappa} 2D,V 6t, 3D,2, and{tau} ). Correlation analyses indicated redundancy among curvature-related metrics, whereas torsion provided independent information. PERMANOVA confirmed that torsion alone, and only metric sets including torsion, achieved significance (p < 0.05). The torsion-based DL model provided the best discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.76 (99 % CI, 0.57-0.94; p < 0.001), specificity 0.82, and a Brier score of 0.18. ConclusionsThe integration of torsion into a DL-based 3D ECG framework enhanced the detection of acute ischemia, increasing diagnostic specificity and improving early triage and clinical decision-making in acute cardiac care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.8%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
4
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
5
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
12
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
17
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
24
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%