AI-driven Mental Health Decision Support Enhances Clinician Resilience and Preparedness
Mircea, M.-T.; McFadyen, J.; Harper, R.; Rollwage, M.; Hauser, T. U.
Show abstract
ObjectivesMental health services are facing unprecedented demand, placing significant pressure on clinicians to conduct timely and effective patient assessments. Rising staff turnover and burnout threatens service quality across many countries. This study examined whether providing clinical information, collected via an AI-enabled decision support tool for mental health assessments in the UKs National Health Service (NHS), could improve clinician wellbeing and patient assessment performance. MethodWe surveyed mental health clinicians (N=131) from nine NHS Mental Health Talking Therapies services on how the information provided by an AI-based decision-support tool impacted their experience with conducting clinical assessments. Clinicians reported on assessments where information from the AI tool was available, as well as when it was not (e.g., GP referrals or telephone intakes). Outcomes included clinician wellbeing, task performance, and cognitive load during assessments, with additional analyses assessing the influence of moderating factors, such as clinician experience, workload, and exposure to the tool. ResultsRelative to traditional methods, assessments supported by information provided by the AI tool were associated with significantly higher clinician wellbeing and task performance, and significantly lower cognitive load, irrespective of the clinicians experience. These benefits were magnified by workload. ConclusionThese findings provide evidence that AI-powered pre-assessment tools can enhance clinician experience by improving wellbeing, boosting task performance, and reducing cognitive burden. By addressing systemic drivers of burnout, such tools offer a scalable intervention to support workforce sustainability and service quality in mental health care.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making: a mixed methods study 92%
- Utilization of Generative AI-drafted Responses for Managing Patient-Provider Communication 92%
- Digital Health Tools for the Passive Monitoring of Depression: A Systematic Review of Methods 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 94%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 92%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study 96%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 93%
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 93%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 93%
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.