Back

Quantitative metagenomics using a portable protocol.

Bian, K.; Busch, A.; Norton, J.; Bott, C.; Gonzalez, R.; Curtis, K.; Tolofari, D.; Khunjar, W.; Graham, K. E.; Pinto, A. J.

2025-10-28 microbiology
10.1101/2025.10.28.684933 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A field-deployable DNA sequencing approach for quantitative microbial community profiling can enable rapid responses for a range of applications in the water sector - from process control to wastewater surveillance. Current quantitative approaches have complex instrumentation requirements and long turnaround time for DNA recovery and absolute quantitation. In this study, we report a field-deployable rapid detection and absolute quantitation (rD+rQ) workflow that leverages the real-time sequencing capabilities of Nanopore sequencing for quantitative metagenomics. This workflow integrates a high-molecular-weight DNA recovery protocol for diverse environmental matrices of relevance to the water sector and multiplexed Nanopore sequencing with barcoded spike-in-based calibration (BSINC). BSINC using multi-species genomic spike-in controls exhibits significantly higher calibration accuracy compared to conventional approaches that utilize either single DNA fragment or single organism spike in controls. Dynamic detection and quantitation limits were established based on coverage fraction of sequenced genomes and the coefficient of variation of genome copy numbers across replicates to enhance the accuracy and precision of microbial quantitation. The rD+rQ workflow achieves species-level identification and absolute quantitative results comparable to digital PCR in environmental samples. This portable laboratory and easy-to-use rD+rQ workflow should facilitate rapid decision-making for the water industry.

Published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.