Suspended Tissue Engineering with Assemblable Microfluidics (STEAM)
Haack, A. J.; Whitten, J. M.; Knudsen, L. A.; Bouker, E. E.; Viswanathan, A. R.; Brown, L. G.; Kim, D. A.; Milton, L. A.; Lin, A.; Georgiou, A.; Schumacher, E. A.; Alizai, M. Y.; Toh, Y.-C.; Berthier, J.; DeForest, C. A.; Sniadecki, N. J.; Theberge, A. B.; Berthier, E.
Show abstract
Suspended tissue culture systems enable cellular responses to mechanical forces critical for tissue development and function. Tissues develop in a complex environment containing both mechanical and chemical cues that vary spatiotemporally; modeling both of these physiochemistries in vitro through integration of spatial patterning with mechanical manipulation is thus an important aspect in microphysiological tissue modeling. Here we introduce Suspended Tissue Engineering with Assemblable Microfluidics (STEAM), a modular tissue fabrication platform that allows for spatially heterogeneous suspended tissue architectures. With STEAM we achieve tissue constructs with multiple regions through the addition of capillary pinning features to control hydrogel precursor flow. STEAM tissues can easily be moved from patterning setup to well-plate to microscope slide, and enables stacking of separately generated layers. Mechanical manipulation post-fabrication is also possible via static stretching, where cell-embedded 3D tissues can be stretched farther apart to induce strain along an axis. To demonstrate this post fabrication strain ability, we induced strain in mouse myoblasts in an engineered muscle tissue model that increased alignment of myotubes. Finally, by modifying the channel geometry of the fluidic based patterning rails, we generate complex nonplanar suspended tissues. Overall, STEAM leverages microfluidic principles to generate suspended tissues that integrate patterning precision, mechanical functionality, and experimental versatility. STEAM provides a suite of tissue constructs for modeling tissue behaviors from the interplay of spatial organization and mechanical forces.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D bioprinting of high cell-density heterogeneous tissue models through spheroid fusion within self-healing hydrogels 97%
- Fibronectin-Based Nanomechanical Biosensors to Map 3D Strains in Live Cells and Tissues 96%
- Mapping cellular-scale internal stiffness in 3D tissues with smart material hydrogel probes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A low-cost, open-source 3D printer for multimaterial and high-throughput direct ink writing of soft and living materials 96%
- Direct 3D-bioprinting of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes to generate functional cardiac tissues 96%
- Embedding biomimetic vascular networks via coaxial sacrificial writing into functional tissue 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- 4D bioprinting shape-morphing tissues in granular support hydrogels: Sculpting structure and guiding maturation 97%
- Programmable viscoelastic hydrogels uncover mechano-sensing timescales and direct cell polarity 94%
- Voxelated Bioprinting of Mechanically Robust Multiscale Porous Scaffolds for Pancreatic Islets 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.