Back

Influenza A Virus detection in Bulk Tank and Pen Level Milk from Dairies Affected by Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1

Stenkamp-Strahm, C.; Lombard, J.; Melody, B.; Brinson, P.; McCluskey, B.

2025-10-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.10.26.25338833 medRxiv
Show abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 has been infecting dairy herds in the U.S. since its initial incursion into cows in early 2024. Although national strategies have aimed to detect affected herds, the best way to surveil herds for the H5N1 virus has not been formally studied and we also do not understand herd-level patterns of infection. To understand infection patterns of H5N1 in dairy herds over time, we conducted early surveillance of non-affected farms in California in the Fall of 2024 in an observational study. Daily bulk tank milk (BTM) samples were submitted from each herd and tested for influenza A (IAV) via rRt-PCR. In a subset of herds, IAV testing of multiple excretion types from cattle of different classes and pen-level daily milk was also completed soon after BTM detection. Daily detections of IAV occurred in BTM for a minimum of 33 days, with some herds continuing to have detection beyond a 75-day window. BTM Ct nadirs were seen between 1-3 weeks of detection. In herds that were tested, virus was detected in the milk from all pens of cattle within a very short time frame after BTM detection, or prior to the initiation of pen level sampling. A very low percentage (2.8%) of individual cow samples tested positive for IAV when collected soon after BTM detection, and although the virus was found in all excretion types, a majority of positive samples were from milk. This suggests that BTM may be the best early indicator of herd infection, and that movement of the virus to all lactating pens of cattle after herd incursion is relatively quick. These results also suggest that surveillance strategies with a long interval between BTM testing days may miss herds with short infection windows. Because most herds experienced test days where some submitted BTM samples had virus detected while others did not, and virus was detected in pen level milk samples when the BTM from the herd had become test negative, this work also highlights the necessity of studying the test sensitivity of IAV rRt-PCR detection in aggregate milk samples. Interpretive summaryThis study characterized daily bulk tank and pen-level milk detections of H5N1 virus on affected dairies. Viral loads in bulk tank samples peaked within three weeks and declined by two months, though some herds showed prolonged detection. Individual cow testing revealed that bulk tank milk testing is more sensitive for H5N1 early outbreak detection, and also identified the likely presence of non-clinically affected cows shedding virus. Pen-level sampling revealed rapid herd-level spread, emphasizing the need for frequent and comprehensive milk sampling to improve detection sensitivity and support effective outbreak management for H5N1 on dairy operations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
5
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%