Back

High-Resolution Variant Profiling of CAH-Associated Genes Using a Long-Read Sequencing Assay

Gu, S.; Chu, G.; Cai, R.; Sun, X.; Lu, Q.; Han, W.; Deng, S.; Wang, X.; Xiang, J.; He, R.

2025-10-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.10.24.25338696 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCongenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a group of autosomal recessive disorders primarily caused by mutations in CYP21A2 and CYP11B1. However, accurate genetic diagnosis remains challenging due to the high sequence homology between these genes and their corresponding homologs (CYP21A1P, CYP11B2). MethodsWe developed NanoCAH (Nanopore-based Comprehensive Analysis of CAH), a targeted long-read sequencing assay based on the Cyclone nanopore platform, CycloneSEQ G100-ER. This approach uses gene-specific long-range PCR to amplify CYP21A2 and CYP11B1, enabling detection of all classes of variants including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number variants (CNVs), and gene conversions. ResultsA total of 59 samples were analyzed by NanoCAH, including 26 singletons and 11 trios. Among these samples, NanoCAH successfully detected all 85 variants previously identified by conventional MLPA and Sanger sequencing (100%, 85/85), including SNVs/Indels, deletions and duplications. Importantly, seven Exon 8 deletions and one Exon 8 duplication undetectable by MLPA were identified by NanoCAH assay. In addition, NanoCAH resolved a novel heterozygous 111-bp in-exon tandem duplication in CYP21A2 (c.65_175dup). NanoCAH further accurately resolved haplotypes in twenty cases without parental data, identifying 18 variants in trans and 2 in cis. These results demonstrate NanoCAHs robust capacity to detect complex variant types and provide precise haplotype resolution in a single assay. ConclusionsNanoCAH provides an accurate, cost-effective, and scalable solution for comprehensive CAH genotyping. Its ability to detect complex variant types and resolve haplotypes in a single assay highlights its potential as a first-line diagnostic tool in clinical genetics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.7%
3
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
17
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%