Development of AWaRe antibiotic quality indicators for optimal use
Heath, A.; Goelen, J.; CHUKI, P.; Cook, A.; Djukic, F.; Do, N. T. T.; Funiciello, E.; Gandra, S.; Godman, B.; Huttner, B.; Khalaf, Y. M.; Lorenzetti, G.; Mendelson, M.; Moore, C. E.; Osorio-de-Castro, C. G. S.; Saleem, Z.; schouten, j.; Tayler, E.; Wesangula, E.; Campbell, S. M.; Sharland, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) (AWaRe (Access/Watch/Reserve) book gives detailed guidance on the optimal use of antibiotics across primary care and hospitals for adults and children with the aim of improving the quality of use. ObjectivesTo develop universally applicable, model sets of appropriate and feasible quality indicators based on the WHO AWaRe system for primary care, hospital, and general indicators for optimal antibiotic use. MethodsIndicators from a scoping review were revised to focus on clinical infections in the AWaRe book. They were assessed using consensus techniques through two rounds each of the Global Delphi Technique and RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, evaluating appropriateness and feasibility at national and global levels respectively. In Round 1 of each method, panellists rated clarity and suggested revisions or new indicator. Round 2 results are reported. FindingsThere were 102 quality indicators (Primary Care: 46; Hospital: 39; General: 17) included in Round 2 of the Delphi Technique and 136 indicators (Primary Care: 56; Hospital: 60; General: 20) in Round 2 of the RAND/UCLA method, which are presented as model sets of indicators. From these broad sets, 12 indicators from the Delphi Technique and 31 indicators from the RAND/UCLA method were rated both appropriate and feasible with agreement respectively. ConclusionThese model AWaRe-based, universally applicable quality indicators can be locally adapted to improve the optimal use of antibiotics and inform global and country specific antimicrobial stewardship programs (AMS).