Back

A novel attention mechanism for noise-adaptive and robust segmentation of microtubules in microscopy images

Ait Laydi, A.; Cueff, L.; Crespo, M.; El Mourabit, Y.; Bouvrais, H.

2026-01-27 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.23.684152 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSegmenting cytoskeletal filaments in microscopy images is essential for studying their roles in cellular processes such as cell division and intracellular transport. However, this task is highly challenging due to the fine, densely packed, and intertwined nature of these structures. Imaging limitations--noise, low contrast, and uneven fluorescence--further complicate analysis. While deep learning has advanced segmentation of large, well-defined biological structures, its performance often degrades under such adverse conditions. Additional challenges include obtaining precise annotations for curvilinear structures and managing severe class imbalance during training. ResultsWe introduce a novel noise-adaptive attention mechanism that extends the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) module to dynamically adjust to varying noise levels. Integrated into a U-Net decoder with residual encoder blocks, this yields ASE_Res_UNet, a lightweight yet high-performance model. To address annotation challenges, we developed a synthetic dataset generation strategy that ensures accurate annotations of fine filaments in noisy images, producing a synthetic dataset with two difficulty levels for segmentation benchmarking. We systematically evaluated loss functions and metrics to mitigate class imbalance, ensuring robust performance assessment. ASE_Res_UNet effectively segmented microtubules in noisy synthetic images, outperforming its ablated variants. It also demonstrated superior segmentation compared to models with alternative attention mechanisms or distinct architectures, while requiring fewer parameters, making it efficient for resource-constrained environments. Evaluation on a newly curated real microscopy dataset and a recently reannotated dataset highlighted ASE_Res_UNets effectiveness in segmenting microtubules beyond synthetic images. For these datasets, ASE_Res_UNet was competitive with a recent synthetic data-driven approach that shares two cytoskeleton pretrained models. Importantly, ASE_Res_UNet generalised well to other curvilinear structures (blood vessels and nerves) across diverse imaging conditions. ConclusionsThis work advances microtubule segmentation through three key contributions: (1) Providing two benchmark datasets (synthetic and real), addressing a critical gap in standardised evaluation resources for this task; (2) Introducing ASE_Res_UNet, a lightweight yet robust model combining noise-adaptive attention with residual learning; (3) Validating competitive performance across synthetic and real microscopy data. Additionally, we demonstrated generalisation to diverse curvilinear structures, showcasing potential for broader applications in biological research and medical diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.2%
2
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
15
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%