Back

The Contextual Affects of Facial Expression

Cui, B.; Bex, P. J.

2025-10-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.23.683775 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Affect recognition and communication are critical for everyday social interaction. Traditional emotion research has often assumed that facial expressions reliably reflect internal emotional states and conform to a set of universal expressions. However, emerging evidence suggests that facial expressions are highly individualized and influenced by context. To investigate these factors, we used genetic algorithms to enable participants to generate personalized facial expressions that best matched their subjective interpretation of affect within written contextual scenarios. 12 participants read standardized scenarios drawn from Howard Schatzs Actors Acting, which had been independently rated (0-4) across 13 primary emotions (Amusement, Anger, Awe, Contempt, Disgust, Embarrassment, Fear, Happiness, Interest, Pride, Sadness, Shame, Surprise). Each primary emotion was paired with all 12 secondary emotions that were either maximized (Condition 1) or minimized (Condition 2). Participants completed 26 such randomly interleaved trials, followed by the last condition (Condition 3) in which they selected faces corresponding directly to each of the 13 emotion words. Faces were generated within the 199-dimensional coefficient space of the Basel Face Database, with a genetic algorithm presenting 12 unique faces across 6 generations per scenario. Faces selected by participants as matching a given scenario were semi-randomly combined to generate 6 offspring per generation, with the remaining 6 faces created randomly to maintain genetic diversity. A 4-way ANOVA (factors: affect, context, generation, participant) on the cosine distances among faces revealed a significant main effect of affect (p =.0061) and a significant interaction between affect and context (p =.0003). These results indicate that distinct facial structures are associated with different emotions, but the representation of a given emotion is context-dependent. This work offers a novel approach to visualizing individual differences in emotion perception and has implications for advancing personalized tools in affective science, including clinical assessment and emotion recognition systems.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
14
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%