Mental health services safe staffing: A commissioned rapid scoping review for NHS England
Edwards, D.; Gillen, E. C.; Evans, N.; Roberts, S.; Whybrow, D.
Show abstract
This Rapid Scoping Review, commissioned by NHS England, examined recent evidence on safe staffing in mental health services, with a focus on mental health nurses across inpatients and community settings. Drawing on literature published between 2018 and 2024, the review addresses two key questions: the impact of nursing skill mix on patient outcomes and the impact of current deployment models in supporting safe, efficient care in mental health services. Findings revealed that inadequate staffing and poor skill mix were perceived to compromise quality and safety. Staff shortages were linked to medication errors, incomplete care and increased aggression, while the use of temporary staff and high absence rates were associated with poorer outcomes. Broader literature suggested that increased staffing may reduce suicide-related events, but mental health nurse specific data were limited. Evidence on shift patterns and deployment was also inconclusive. Overall, the evidence base was fragmented and of low quality, limiting the ability to make definitive policy recommendations. However, the findings may inform future pilot service evaluations and targeted improvements in mental health nurse staffing strategies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 95%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 94%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 95%
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 95%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical benefits of modifying the evening light environment in an acute psychiatric unit: A single-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, pragmatic effectiveness randomised controlled trial 91%
- Suicide after leaving the UK Armed Forces 1996-2018: a cohort study 91%
- Mitigating the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions: The B ehavioural A ctivation in S ocial I so l ation (BASIL) pilot randomised controlled trial to prevent depression and loneliness among older people with long term conditions 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 95%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 94%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mental Illness Symptoms in Spain in the COVID-19 Crisis 91%
- The Acceptability of a Tobacco Dependency Treatment for NHS Staff in the North East of England: A Mixed-Methods Study 91%
- One Year of Evidence on Mental Health in the COVID-19 Crisis - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.