Back

Is the whole more than the sum of its parts? Considering global and local features of the connectome improves prediction of individuals and phenotype

Riley, S.; Cheng, A.; Wang, Y.-W.; Shen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Holmes, A.; Constable, R. T.; Yip, S. W.

2025-12-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.22.683965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Popular methods for analyzing the brains functional connectome examine statistical associations between pairs of atlas-defined brain regions, viewing the strength of these links as independent values. However, edges within a standard connectivity matrix, i.e., correlations between individual regions or nodes, are not independent. They are part of an interconnected system. Here, we propose that consideration of both independent, linear relationships (as in standard approaches such as linear kernel ridge regression and connectome-based predictive modeling) as well as higher order statistical associations - such as tertiary interactions between matrix components and global features of the matrix space - will enhance identification of meaningful individual differences. To test this, we adopt a geometrically grounded measure of similarity that accounts for higher-order local statistical relationships and global interactions, the Wasserstein metric. Results indicate that considering connectivity matrices as representations of their associated Gaussian distributions significantly improves both identification of individuals based on their connectivity matrices (aka, fingerprinting) and prediction of individual differences in phenotypes such as fluid intelligence and openness to experience. Thus, both pairwise local and global brain connectivity properties encode for meaningful individual differences that relate to phenotypic expressions and should be considered in brain-behavior predictive models.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.6%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%