Back

The Role Of Drug Indication On Incidence Rate Heterogeneity: A Large-Scale, Systematic Evaluation Across An International Network Of Observational Databases

Chen, H. Y.; Knoll, C.; Boventer, E.; Pratt, N.; Anand, T. V.; Van Zandt, M.; Morgan-Cooper, H.; Ryan, P.; Hripcsak, G. M.

2025-10-24 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.10.22.25338563 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeIncidence rate estimates are sensitive to a range of factors, including age, sex, and geographical setting (data source). The magnitude of the impact of drug indication on incidence rates remains underexplored. MethodsWe conducted an observational cohort study using 13 healthcare databases to estimate the incidence rates of 73 health outcomes across 8 drug classes with multiple indications. We calculated incidence rates for each drug-outcome pair and performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool results across databases. Then, we conducted variance components analysis to find the proportions of variability attributed to database, age, sex, and indication. We reported the median of the variance components across all 73 health outcomes as a measure of the magnitude of differences across indications, age, sex, and database, per drug class. ResultsAdjusting for database, age, and sex differences, the drug classes with the highest median VC were trimethoprim (0.49), SGLT-2 inhibitors (0.26), and beta blockers (0.10), while the drug class with the lowest VC was GLP-1 agonists (<0.01). Within each drug class, and adjusting for all other factors, age was frequently the strongest contributor to incidence variation (for 5/8 drug classes, the highest class-wide median VC was the age median VC), followed by database, indication, then biological sex. ConclusionThis study showed that for some drug classes, there exists substantial variation in incidence rates estimates across indications even after accounting for heterogeneity due to age, biological sex, and data source. As many drugs have multiple indications in clinical practice, it may be important to consider drug indication when estimating incidence rates in observational studies for the purpose of patient safety evaluations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
4
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%